1.1.3
The position or
`environment' of a word in a sentence.......................................... 6
11.7 The Grammatical Hierarchy: Words, Phrases, Clauses, and Sentences........................ 77
1 An Introduction to Word classes
Words are
fundamental units in every sentence, so we will begin by looking at these.
Consider the words in the following sentence:
my brother drives a big car
We can tell
almost instinctively that brother and
car are the same type of word, and
also that brother and drives are different types of words. By
this we mean that brother and car belong to the same word class.
Similarly, when we recognise that brother
and drives are different types,
we mean that they belong to different word classes. We recognise seven MAJOR
word classes:
Verb |
be, drive,
grow, sing, think |
Noun |
brother, car,
David, house, London |
Determiner |
a, an, my,
some, the |
Adjective |
big, foolish,
happy, talented, tidy |
Adverb |
happily,
recently, soon, then, there |
Preposition |
at, in, of,
over, with |
Conjunction |
and, because,
but, if, or |
You may find
that other grammars recognise different word classes from the ones listed here.
They may also define the boundaries between the classes in different ways. In
some grammars, for instance, pronouns are treated as a separate word class,
whereas we treat them as a subclass of nouns. A difference like this should not
cause confusion. Instead, it highlights an important principle in grammar,
known as GRADIENCE. This refers to the fact that the boundaries between the
word classes are not absolutely fixed. Many word classes share characteristics
with others, and there is considerable overlap between some of the classes. In
other words, the boundaries are "fuzzy", so different grammars draw
them in different places.
We will discuss
each of the major word classes in turn. Then we will look briefly at some MINOR
word classes. But first, let us consider how we distinguish between word
classes in general.
1.1 Criteria for Word Classes
We began by
grouping words more or less on the basis of our instincts about English. We
somehow "feel" that brother and
car belong to the same class, and
that brother and drives belong to
different classes. However, in order to conduct an
informed study of grammar, we need a much more reliable and more systematic
method than this for distinguishing between word classes.
We use a combination of three
criteria for determining the word class of a word:
1. The
meaning of the word
2. The form
or `shape' of the word
3. The
position or `environment' of the word in a sentence
1.1.1
Meaning
Using this
criterion, we generalize about the kind of meanings that words convey. For
example, we could group together the words brother
and car, as well as David, house, and London, on the
basis that they all refer to people, places, or things. In fact, this has
traditionally been a popular approach to determining members of the class of
nouns. It has also been applied to verbs, by saying that they denote some kind
of "action", like cook, drive, eat, run, shout, walk.
This approach
has certain merits, since it allows us to determine word classes by replacing
words in a sentence with words of "similar" meaning. For instance, in
the sentence My son cooks dinner every
Sunday, we can replace the verb cooks
with other "action" words:
My son cooks dinner every Sunday My son prepares dinner every Sunday My son eats dinner every Sunday
My son misses dinner
every Sunday
On the basis of
this replacement test, we can conclude that all of these words belong to the
same class, that of "action" words, or verbs.
However, this
approach also has some serious limitations. The definition of a noun as a word
denoting a person, place, or thing, is wholly inadequate, since it excludes
abstract nouns such as time, imagination, repetition, wisdom, and chance. Similarly, to say that verbs are
"action" words excludes a verb like be, as in I want to be happy.
What "action" does be refer
to here? So although this criterion has a certain validity when applied to some
words, we need other, more stringent criteria as well.
1.1.2
The
form or `shape' of a word
Some words can be assigned to a word class on
the basis of their form or `shape'. For example, many nouns have a
characteristic -tion ending:
action,
condition, contemplation, demonstration,
organization, repetition
Similarly, many adjectives end in -able or -ible:
Many words also take what are called INFLECTIONS, that is, regular
changes in their form under certain conditions. For example, nouns can take a
plural inflection, usually by adding an -s
at the end:
car -- cars dinner -- dinners book -- books
Verbs also take inflections:
walk -- walks -- walked -- walking
1.1.3
The
position or `environment' of a word in a sentence
This criterion refers to where words typically occur in a sentence, and
the kinds of words which typically occur near to them. We can illustrate the
use of this criterion using a simple example. Compare the following:
[1]
I cook dinner
every Sunday
[2] The cook is on holiday
In [1], cook is a verb, but in
[2], it is a noun. We can see that it is a verb in [1] because it takes the
inflections which are typical of verbs:
I
cook dinner every Sunday I cooked dinner last Sunday I am cooking dinner today
My son cooks dinner every Sunday
And we can see
that cook is a noun in [2] because it
takes the plural -s inflection
The cooks are
on holiday
If we really need to, we can also
apply a replacement test, based on our first criterion, replacing
cook in each sentence with "similar" words:
Notice that we can replace verbs with verbs, and nouns
with nouns, but we cannot replace verbs with nouns or nouns with verbs:
*I chef dinner every Sunday
*The eat is on holiday
It should be
clear from this discussion that there is no one-to-one relation between words
and their classes. Cook can be a verb
or a noun -- it all depends on how the word is used. In fact, many words can
belong to more than one word class. Here are some more examples:
She looks very
pale (verb)
She's very proud of her looks (noun)
He drives a fast car (adjective)
He drives very fast on the motorway (adverb)
Turn on the light
(noun)
I'm trying to light the fire (verb)
I usually have a light lunch (adjective)
You will see
here that each italicised word can belong to more than one word class. However,
they only belong to one word class at a time, depending on how they are used.
So it is quite wrong to say, for example, "cook is a verb". Instead, we have to say something like "cook is a verb in the sentence I cook dinner every Sunday, but it is a
noun in The cook is on holiday".
Of the three
criteria for word classes that we have discussed here, the Internet Grammar
will emphasise the second and third - the form of words, and how they are
positioned or how they function in sentences.
1.2 Open and Closed Word Classes
Some word
classes are OPEN, that is, new words can be added to the class as the need
arises. The class of nouns, for instance, is potentially infinite, since it is
continually being expanded as new scientific discoveries are made, new products
are developed, and new ideas are explored. In the late twentieth century, for
example, developments in computer technology have given rise to many new nouns:
Internet, website, URL, CD-ROM, email, newsgroup, bitmap, modem, multimedia
New verbs have also been
introduced:
download, upload, reboot, right-click, double-click
The adjective
and adverb classes can also be expanded by the addition of new words, though
less prolifically.
On the other
hand, we never invent new prepositions, determiners, or conjunctions. These
classes include words like of, the, and but. They are called CLOSED word classes because they are made up
of finite sets of words which are never expanded (though their members may
change their spelling, for example, over long periods of time). The subclass of
pronouns, within the open noun class, is also closed.
Words in an open class are
known as open-class items. Words in a
closed class are known as
closed-class
items.
In the pages which follow, we
will look in detail at each of the seven major word classes.
2
Nouns
Nouns
are commonly thought of as "naming" words, and specifically as the
names of "people, places, or things". Nouns such as John, London, and computer certainly
fit this description, but the class of nouns is much broader than this. Nouns
also denote abstract and intangible concepts such as birth, happiness, evolution, technology, management, imagination, revenge, politics, hope, cookery, sport, literacy....
Because of this
enormous diversity of reference, it is not very useful to study nouns solely in
terms of their meaning. It is much more fruitful to consider them from the
point of view of their formal characteristics.
2.1 Characteristics of Nouns
Many nouns can be recognised by
their endings. Typical noun endings include:
-er/-or |
actor,
painter, plumber, writer |
-ism |
criticism,
egotism, magnetism, vandalism |
-ist |
artist,
capitalist, journalist, scientist |
-ment |
arrangement,
development, establishment, government |
-tion |
foundation,
organisation, recognition, supposition |
Most nouns have
distinctive SINGULAR and PLURAL forms. The plural of regular nouns is formed by
adding -s to the singular:
Singular |
Plural |
car |
cars |
dog |
dogs |
house |
houses |
However, there are many irregular
nouns which do not form the plural in this way:
Singular |
Plural |
man |
men |
child |
children |
sheep |
sheep |
The distinction between singular
and plural is known as NUMBER CONTRAST.
We can recognise many nouns
because they often have the, a, or an in front of them:
the car an artist a surprise the egg
a review
These words are
called determiners, which is the next word class we will look at. Nouns may
take an -'s ("apostrophe s") or GENITIVE MARKER to indicate
possession:
the boy's pen a spider's web
my girlfriend's
brother
John's house
If the noun
already has an -s ending to mark the
plural, then the genitive marker appears only as an apostrophe after the plural
form:
the boys'
pens the spiders' webs the
Browns'
house
The genitive
marker should not be confused with the 's
form of contracted verbs, as in John's
a good boy (= John is a good boy).
Nouns often co-occur without a
genitive marker between them:
rally car table top cheese grater
University entrance
examination
We will look at these in more
detail later, when we discuss noun phrases.
2.2 Common and Proper Nouns
Nouns which name specific people
or places are known as PROPER NOUNS.
John Mary London France
Many names consist of more than
one word:
John Wesley Queen Mary South Africa Atlantic Ocean
Buckingham Palace
Proper nouns may also refer to
times or to dates in the calendar:
January,
February, Monday, Tuesday, Christmas, Thanksgiving
All other nouns are COMMON NOUNS.
Since proper nouns usually refer to something or someone
unique, they do not normally take plurals. However, they may do so, especially
when number is being specifically referred to:
there
are three Davids in my class we met
two Christmases ago
For the same reason, names of
people and places are not normally preceded by determiners the or
a/an, though they can be in certain circumstances:
it's nothing
like the America I remember my
brother is an Einstein at maths
2.3 Count and Non-count Nouns
Common nouns are either count or non-count. COUNT nouns can be
"counted", as follows: one pen,
two pens, three pens, four pens...
NON-COUNT nouns, on the other
hand, cannot be counted in this way:
one software,
*two softwares, *three softwares, *four softwares...
From the point of view of grammar, this means that count nouns have
singular as well as plural forms, whereas non-count nouns have only a singular
form.
It also means that non-count
nouns do not take a/an before them:
Count Non-count
a pen *a
software
In general, non-count nouns are considered to refer to indivisible
wholes. For this reason, they are sometimes called MASS nouns.
Some common
nouns may be either count or non-count, depending on the kind of reference they
have. For example, in I made a cake, cake is a count noun, and the a before it indicates singular number.
However, in I like cake, the
reference is less specific. It refers to "cake in general", and so cake is non-count in this sentence.
2.4 Pronouns
Pronouns are a major subclass of nouns. We
call them a subclass of nouns because they can sometimes replace a noun in a
sentence:
Noun |
Pronoun |
John got a new job |
~He got a new job |
Children should watch
less television |
~They should watch less television |
In these examples the pronouns have the same reference as the nouns which
they replace. In each case, they refer to people, and so we call them PERSONAL
PRONOUNS. However, we also include in this group the pronoun it, although this pronoun does not
usually refer to a person. There are three personal pronouns, and each has a
singular and a plural form:
Person |
Singular |
Plural |
1st |
I |
we |
2nd |
you |
you |
3rd |
he/she/it |
they |
These pronouns also have another
set of forms, which we show here:
Person |
Singular |
Plural |
1st |
me |
us |
2nd |
you |
you |
3rd |
him/her/it |
them |
The first set of
forms (I, you, he...) exemplifies the
SUBJECTIVE CASE, and the second set (me,
you, him...) exemplifies the OBJECTIVE CASE. The distinction between the
two cases relates to how they can be used in sentences. For instance, in our
first example above, we say that he can
replace John
John got a new job ~He got
a new job
But he cannot
replace John in I gave John a new job. Here, we have to use the objective form him: I
gave him a new job.
2.5 Other Types of Pronoun
As
well as personal pronouns, there are many other types, which we summarise here.
Pronoun
Type |
Members
of the Subclass |
Example |
Possessive |
mine, yours, his, hers, ours, theirs |
The white car is mine |
Reflexive |
myself,
yourself, himself, herself, itself, oneself, ourselves, yourselves,
themselves |
He
injured himself playing football |
Reciprocal |
each
other, one another |
They really hate each other |
Relative |
that, which, who, whose, whom, where, when |
The
book that you gave me was really
boring |
Demonstrative |
this,
that, these, those |
This
is
a new car |
Interrogative |
who, what, why, where, when, whatever |
What
did
he say to you? |
Indefinite |
anything,
anybody, anyone, something, somebody,
someone, nothing, nobody, none, no one |
There's something in my shoe |
Case and number
distinctions do not apply to all pronoun types. In fact, they apply only to
personal pronouns, possessive pronouns, and reflexive pronouns. It is only in
these types, too, that gender differences are shown (personal he/she, possessive his/hers, reflexive himself/herself).
All other types are unvarying in their form.
Many of the
pronouns listed above also belong to another word class - the class of
determiners. They are pronouns when they occur independently, that is, without
a noun following them, as in This is a
new car. But when a noun follows them - This
car is new - they are determiners. We will look at determiners in the next
section.
A major difference between pronouns and nouns generally
is that pronouns do not take the or a/an before them. Further, pronouns do
not take adjectives before them, except in very restricted constructions
involving some indefinite pronouns (a
little something, a certain someone).
While the class of nouns as a
whole is an open class, the subclass of pronouns is closed.
2.6
Numerals
Numerals include
all numbers, whether as words or as digits. They may be divided into two major
types. CARDINAL numerals include words like:
nought, zero,
one, two, 3, fifty-six, 100, a thousand
ORDINAL numerals include
first, 2nd,
third, fourth, 500th
We classify
numerals as a subclass of nouns because in certain circumstances they can take
plurals:
five twos are ten he's in his eighties
They may also take the:
the fourth of
July
a product of the 1960s
And some plural numerals can take
an adjective before them, just like other nouns:
the house was built in the late 1960s
he's in his early
twenties
the temperature is in the high nineties
In each of our
examples, the numerals occur independently, that is, without a noun following
them. In these positions, we can classify them as a type of noun because they
behave in much the same way as nouns do. Notice, for example, that we can
replace the numerals in our examples with common nouns:
he is in his eighties ~he
is in his bedroom
the fourth of July ~the
beginning of July
a product of the 1960s ~a
product of the revolution
Numerals do not always occur
independently. They often occur before a noun, as in
three pages
the fourth day
of July
In this
position, we classify them as determiners, which we will examine in the next section. Finally, see if you can answer
this question:
Is the subclass of numerals
open or closed?
2.7 The Gender of Nouns
The gender of
nouns plays an important role in the grammar of some languages. In French, for
instance, a masculine noun can only take the masculine form of an adjective. If
the noun is feminine, then it will take a different form of the same adjective
- its feminine form.
In English,
however, nouns are not in themselves masculine or feminine. They do not have
grammatical gender, though they may refer to male or female people or animals:
the waiter is very prompt ~the waitress
is very prompt the lion roars at night ~the lioness roars at night
These
distinctions in spelling reflect differences in sex, but they have no
grammatical implications. For instance, we use the same form of an adjective
whether we are referring to a waiter or to a waitress:
an efficient
waiter ~an efficient waitress
Similarly, the natural distinctions reflected in such pairs as brother/sister, nephew/niece, and king/queen have
no consequence for grammar. While they refer to specific sexes, these words are
not masculine or feminine in themselves.
However, gender is significant
in the choice of a personal pronoun to replace a noun:
John is late ~He is
late
Mary is
late ~She is late
Here the choice of pronoun is determined by the sex of
the person being referred to. However, this distinction is lost in the plural:
John and Mary are late ~They are late John and David are late ~They are late Mary and Jane are late ~They are late
Gender
differences are also manifested in possessive pronouns (his/hers) and in reflexive pronouns (himself/herself).
When the notion
of sex does not apply -- when we refer to inanimate objects, for instance -- we
use the pronoun it:
the letter arrived late ~it arrived late
3 Determiners
Nouns are often preceded by the words the,
a, or an. These words are called DETERMINERS. They indicate the kind of
reference which the noun has. The determiner the is known as the DEFINITE ARTICLE. It is used before both
singular and plural nouns:
Singular |
Plural |
the
taxi |
the taxis |
the
paper |
the papers |
the
apple |
the apples |
The determiner a (or an, when the following noun begins with a vowel) is the INDEFINITE
ARTICLE. It is used when the noun is singular:
a taxi
a paper
an apple
The
articles the and a/an are the most common determiners, but there are many others:
any taxi
that question those apples this paper some apple whatever taxi whichever taxi
Many determiners express
quantity:
all examples both parents many people each person every night
several computers few excuses enough water
no escape
Perhaps the most
common way to express quantity is to use a numeral. We look at numerals as
determiners in the next section.
3.1 Numerals and Determiners
Numerals are
determiners when they appear before a noun. In this position, cardinal numerals
express quantity:
one book two books twenty books
In the same position, ordinal
numerals express sequence:
first impressions second chance third prize
The subclass of ordinals includes a set of words which are not directly
related to numbers (as first is
related to one, second is related to two,
etc). These are called general ordinals, and they include last, latter, next, previous, and subsequent.
These words also function as determiners:
next week
last orders
subsequent developments
When they do not come before a noun, as we've already seen, numerals are
a subclass of nouns. And like nouns, they can take determiners:
the two of us
the first of many
They can even have numerals as
determiners before them:
five twos are ten
In this example, twos is a plural noun and it has the
determiner five before it.
3.2 Pronouns and Determiners
There is
considerable overlap between the determiner class and the subclass of pronouns.
Many words can be both:
Pronoun |
Determiner |
This is a very boring book |
This book is very boring |
That's an excellent film |
That film is excellent |
As this table
shows, determiners always come before a noun, but pronouns are more independent
than this. They function in much the same way as nouns, and they can be
replaced by nouns in the sentences above:
This is a very boring book ~Ivanhoe is a very boring book
That's
an excellent film ~Witness is an excellent film
On the other hand, when these
words are determiners, they cannot be replaced by nouns:
This book
is very boring ~*Ivanhoe book is very
boring
That film is excellent ~*Witness
film is excellent
The personal
pronouns (I, you, he, etc) cannot be
determiners. This is also true of the possessive pronouns (mine, yours, his/hers, ours, and theirs).
However, these pronouns do have corresponding forms which are determiners:
Possessive
Pronoun |
Determiner |
The
white car is mine |
My car is white |
Yours is the blue coat |
Your coat is blue |
The
car in the garage is his/hers |
His/her car is in the garage |
David's
house is big, but ours is bigger |
Our house is bigger than
David's |
Theirs is the house on the left |
Their house is on the left |
The definite and the indefinite
articles can never be pronouns. They are always determiners.
3.3 The Ordering of Determiners
Determiners
occur before nouns, and they indicate the kind of reference which the nouns
have. Depending on their relative position before a noun, we distinguish three
classes of determiners.
|
Predeterminer |
Central Determiner |
Postdeterminer |
Noun |
I met |
all |
my |
many |
friends |
A sentence like
this is somewhat unusual, because it is rare for all three determiner slots to
be filled in the same sentence. Generally, only one or two slots are filled.
3.4
Predeterminers
Predeterminers
specify quantity in the noun which follows them, and they are of three
major types:
1. "Multiplying"
expressions, including expressions ending in
times:
twice my salary double my salary ten times my
salary
2. Fractions
half my salary
one-third my salary
3. The
words all and both:
all my salary
both my salaries Predeterminers
do not normally co-occur:
*all half my
salary
3.5 Central Determiners
The definite article the and
the indefinite article a/an are the
most common central determiners: all the book
half a chapter
As many of our
previous examples show, the word my can
also occupy the central determiner slot. This is equally true of the other
possessives:
all
your money all his/her money all our money
all their money
The demonstratives, too, are
central determiners:
all
these problems twice that size
four times this
amount
3.6 Postdeterminers
Cardinal
and ordinal numerals occupy the postdeterminer slot:
the two children his fourth birthday
This applies also to general
ordinals:
my next project our last meeting
your previous remark her subsequent letter
Other quantifying expressions are
also postdeterminers:
my many friends
our several achievements the few friends that I have
Unlike predeterminers,
postdeterminers can co-occur:
my next two projects
several other people
4
Verbs
Verbs have traditionally been defined as "action" words or
"doing" words. The verb in the following sentence is rides:
Paul rides a bicycle
Here, the verb rides certainly
denotes an action which Paul performs - the action of riding a bicycle.
However, there are many verbs which do not denote an action at all. For
example, in Paul seems unhappy, we
cannot say that the verb seems denotes
an action. We would hardly say that Paul is performing any action when he seems
unhappy. So the notion of verbs as "action" words is somewhat
limited.
We can achieve a more robust
definition of verbs by looking first at their formal features.
4.1
The
Base Form
Here are some examples of verbs
in sentences:
[1] She travels to work by train
[2] David sings in the choir
[3] We walked five miles to a garage
[4] I cooked a meal for the family
Notice that in [1] and [2], the
verbs have an -s ending, while in [3]
and [4], they have an -ed
ending. These endings are known as INFLECTIONS, and they
are added to the BASE FORM of the verb. In [1], for instance, the -s inflection is added to the base form travel.
Certain endings are
characteristic of the base forms of verbs:
Ending |
Base Form |
-ate |
concentrate,
demonstrate, illustrate |
-ify |
clarify,
dignify, magnify |
-ise/-ize |
baptize,
conceptualize, realise |
4.2 Past and Present Forms
When we refer to
a verb in general terms, we usually cite its base form, as in "the verb travel", "the verb sing". We then add inflections to
the base form as required.
|
Base Form |
+ |
Inflection |
|
[1]
She |
travel |
+ |
s |
to work by train |
[2]
David |
sing |
+ |
s |
in the choir |
[3]
We |
walk |
+ |
ed |
five miles to a garage |
[4]
I |
cook |
+ |
ed |
a meal for the whole family |
These inflections indicate TENSE.
The -s inflection indicates the
PRESENT TENSE, and the -ed
inflection indicates the PAST
TENSE.
Verb endings
also indicate PERSON. Recall that when we looked at nouns and pronouns, we saw
that there are three persons, each with a singular and a plural form. These are
shown in the table below.
Singular |
Plural |
|
1st Person |
I |
we |
2nd person |
you |
you |
3rd Person |
he/she/John/the
dog |
they/the dogs |
In sentence [1],
She travels to work by train, we have
a third person singular pronoun she,
and the present tense ending -s.
However, if we replace she with a
plural pronoun, then the verb will change:
[1]
She travels to work by train [1a]
They travel to work by train
The verb travel in [1a] is
still in the present tense, but it has changed because the pronoun in front of
it has changed. This correspondence between the pronoun (or noun) and the verb
is called AGREEMENT or CONCORD. Agreement applies only to verbs in the present
tense. In the past tense, there is no distinction between verb forms: she travelled/they travelled.
4.3 The Infinitive Form
The INFINITIVE
form of a verb is the form which follows to:
to ask
to believe
to cry
to go
to protect
to
sing to talk to wish
This form is
indistinguishable from the base form. Indeed, many people cite this form when
they identify a verb, as in "This is the verb to be", although to is
not part of the verb.
Infinitives with
to are referred to specifically as
TO-INFINITIVES, in order to distinguish them from BARE INFINITIVES, in which to is absent:
To-infinitive |
Bare
infinitive |
Help me to open the gate |
Help me open
the gate |
4.4
More Verb Forms: -ing and -ed
So far we have
looked at three verb forms: the present form, the past form, and the
infinitive/base form. Verbs have two further forms which we will look at now.
[1] The old
lady is writing a play
[2] The film
was produced in Hollywood
The verb
form writing in [1] is known as the -ing form, or the -ING PARTICIPLE form. In [2], the verb form produced is called the -ed form,
or -ED PARTICIPLE form.
Many so-called -ed participle forms do not end in -ed at all:
The film was written
by John Brown
The film was bought by a British company The film was
made in Hollywood
All of these
forms are called -ed participle
forms, despite their various endings. The term "-ed participle form" is simply a cover term for all of these
forms.
The -ed participle form should
not be confused with the -ed inflection
which is used to indicate the past tense of many verbs.
We have now
looked at all five verb forms. By way of summary, let us bring them together
and see how they look for different verbs. For convenience, we will illustrate
only the third person singular forms (the forms which agree with he/she/it) of each verb. Notice that
some verbs have irregular past forms and -ed forms.
Base/Infinitive
Form |
Present
Tense Form |
Past Tense
Form |
-ing Form |
-ed Form |
cook |
he cooks |
he cooked |
he is cooking |
he has cooked |
walk |
he walks |
he walked |
he is walking |
he has walked |
take |
he takes |
he took |
he is taking |
he has taken |
bring |
he brings |
he brought |
he is bringing |
he has brought |
be |
he is |
he was |
he is being |
he has been |
4.5
Finite
and Nonfinite Verbs
Verbs which have
the past or the present form are called FINITE verbs. Verbs in any other form
(infinitive, -ing, or -ed) are called NONFINITE verbs. This
means that verbs with tense are finite, and verbs without tense are nonfinite.
The distinction between finite and nonfinite verbs is a very important one in
grammar, since it affects how verbs behave in sentences. Here are some examples
of each type:
|
Tense |
Finite or Nonfinite? |
David
plays the piano |
Present |
Finite |
My
sister spoke French on holiday |
Past |
Finite |
It took courage to continue
after the accident |
NONE --
the verb has the infinitive form |
Nonfinite |
Leaving home can be very traumatic |
NONE -- the verb has the -ing form |
Nonfinite |
Leave
immediately when you are asked to do so |
NONE -- the verb has the -ed form |
Nonfinite |
4.6
Auxiliary Verbs
In the examples of -ing and -ed forms which we looked at, you may
have noticed that in each case two verbs appeared:
[1]
The old lady is writing a play
[2]
The film was
produced in Hollywood
Writing and produced each has another verb before
it. These other verbs (is and was) are known as AUXILIARY VERBS, while
writing and produced are known as MAIN VERBS or LEXICAL VERBS. In fact, all the
verbs we have looked at on the previous pages have been main verbs.
Auxiliary verbs
are sometimes called HELPING VERBS. This is because they may be said to
"help" the main verb which comes after them. For example, in The old lady is writing a play, the
auxiliary is helps the main verb writing by specifying that the action it
denotes is still in progress.
4.7 Auxiliary Verb Types
In this section
we will give a brief account of of each type of auxiliary verb in English.
There are five types in total:
Passive be |
This is used to form passive constructions, eg. The film was
produced in Hollywood It has a corresponding present form: The film is
produced in Hollywood We will return to passives later, when we look at voice. |
Progressive be |
As the
name suggests, the progressive expresses action in progress: The old
lady is writing a play It also has
a past form: The old lady
was writing a play |
Perfective have |
The
perfective auxiliary expresses an action accomplished in the past but
retaining current relevance: She has broken
her leg (Compare: She broke her leg) Together
with the progressive auxiliary, the perfective auxiliary encodes aspect, which we will look at later. |
Modal can/could
may/might shall/should will/would must |
Modals express permission, ability, obligation, or prediction: You can have a
sweet if you like He may arrive
early Paul will be a footballer some day I really
should leave now |
Dummy Do |
This subclass contains only the verb do. It is used to form |
|
questions: Do you like cheese? to form negative statements: I do not like
cheese and in giving orders: Do not eat the cheese Finally, dummy do
can be used for emphasis: I do
like cheese |
An important
difference between auxiliary verbs and main verbs is that auxiliaries never
occur alone in a sentence. For instance, we cannot remove the main verb from a
sentence, leaving only the auxiliary:
I would like a new job ~*I would
a new job You should buy a new
car ~*You should a new car She must be crazy ~*She
must crazy
Auxiliaries
always occur with a main verb. On the other hand, main verbs can occur without
an auxiliary.
I like my
new job
I bought a new car She sings like a bird
In some sentences,
it may appear that an auxiliary does occur alone. This is especially true in
responses to questions:
Q. Can you sing?
A. Yes, I can
Here the
auxiliary can does not really occur
without a main verb, since the main verb -- sing
-- is in the question. The response is understood to mean:
This is known as ellipsis
-- the main verb has been ellipted from
the response.
Auxiliaries
often appear in a shortened or contracted form, especially in informal
contexts. For instance, auxiliary have is
often shortened to 've:
I have won the lottery ~I've won
the lottery
These shortened
forms are called enclitic forms.
Sometimes different auxiliaries have the same enclitic forms, so you should
distinguish carefully between them:
I'd like a new job ( = modal auxiliary would)
We'd already spent the money by then ( = perfective auxiliary had)
He's been in there for ages ( =
perfective auxiliary has) She's eating her lunch ( = progressive
auxiliary is)
The following exercise
concentrates on three of the most important auxiliaries -- be, have, and do.
4.8 The NICE Properties of Auxiliaries
The so-called
NICE properties of auxiliaries serve to distinguish them from main verbs. NICE
is an acronym for:
Negation |
Auxiliaries take not or n't to form the
negative, eg. cannot, don't, wouldn't |
Inversion |
Auxiliaries invert with what precedes them
when we form questions: [I will]
see you soon ~[Will I] see you
soon? |
Code |
Auxiliaries may occur "stranded"
where a main verb has been omitted: John never sings, but Mary does |
Emphasis |
Auxiliaries can be used for emphasis: I do like
cheese |
Main verbs do not exhibit these properties. For
instance, when we form a question using a main verb, we cannot invert:
[John sings]
in the choir ~*[Sings John] in the
choir?
Instead, we have to use the
auxiliary verb do:
[John sings]
in the choir ~[Does John sing] in the choir?
4.9 Semi-auxiliaries
Among the
auxiliary verbs, we distinguish a large number of multi-word verbs, which are
called SEMI-AUXILIARIES. These are two-or three-word combinations, and they
include the following:
get to happen to have to mean to
seem to tend to turn out to used to
be about to be going to be likely
to
be supposed to
Like other auxiliaries, the
semi-auxiliaries occur before main verbs:
The film is about to start
I'm going to interview the Lord Mayor I have to leave early today
You
are supposed to sign both forms I used to live in that house
Some of these
combinations may, of course, occur in other contexts in which they are not
semi- auxiliaries. For example:
I'm going to
London
Here, the combination is not a semi-auxiliary, since it does not occur
with a main verb. In this sentence, going
is a main verb. Notice that it could be replaced by another main verb such
as travel (I'm travelling to London). The word 'm is
the contracted form of am, the progressive
auxiliary,
and to, as we'll see later, is a
preposition.
4.10 Tense and Aspect
TENSE refers to
the absolute location of an event or action in time, either the present or the
past. It is marked by an inflection of the verb:
David walks to school (present tense) David walked to school (past tense)
Reference to
other times -- the future, for instance -- can be made in a number of ways, by
using the modal auxiliary will, or
the semi-auxiliary be going to:
David will
walk to school tomorrow
David is going
to walk to school tomorrow.
Since the
expression of future time does not involve any inflecton of the verb, we do not
refer to a "future tense". Strictly speaking, there are only two
tenses in English: present and past.
ASPECT refers to
how an event or action is to be viewed with respect to time, rather than to its
actual location in time. We can illustrate this using the following examples:
[1]
David fell
in love on his eighteenth birthday
[2]
David has
fallen in love
[3]
David is
falling in love
In [1], the verb fell tells us
that David fell in love in the past, and specifically on his eighteenth
birthday. This is a simple past tense verb.
In [2] also, the
action took place in the past, but it is implied that it took place quite
recently. Furthermore, it is implied that is still relevant at the time of
speaking -- David has fallen in love, and that's why he's behaving strangely.
It is worth noting that we cannot say *David
has fallen in love on his eighteenth birthday. The auxiliary has here encodes what is known as
PERFECTIVE ASPECT, and the auxiliary itself is known as the PERFECTIVE
AUXILIARY.
In [3], the
action of falling in love is still in progress -- David is falling in love at
the time of speaking. For this reason, we call it PROGRESSIVE ASPECT, and the
auxiliary is called the PROGRESSIVE AUXILIARY.
Aspect always
includes tense. In [2] and [3] above, the aspectual auxiliaries are in the
present tense, but they could also be in the past tense:
David had fallen in love -- Perfective Aspect,
Past Tense David was falling in love
-- Progressive Aspect, Past Tense
The perfective auxiliary is always followed by a main
verb in the -ed form, while the
progressive auxiliary is followed by a main verb in the -ing form. We exemplify these points in the table below:
Perfective
Aspect Progressive Aspect Present Tense has fallen is falling
Past Tense had fallen was
falling
While aspect
always includes tense, tense can occur without aspect (David falls in love, David fell in love).
4.11 Voice
There are two voices in
English, the active voice and the passive voice:
Active Voice Passive Voice
[1] Paul congratulated David [2]
David was congratulated by Paul
Passive
constructions are formed using the PASSIVE AUXILIARY be, and the main verb has an -ed
inflection. In active constructions, there is no passive auxiliary, though
other auxiliaries may occur:
Paul is congratulating David Paul will congratulate David Paul has congratulated David
All of these
examples are active constructions, since they contain no passive auxiliary.
Notice that in the first example (Paul is
congratulating David), the auxiliary is the progressive auxiliary, not the
passive auxiliary. We know this because the main verb congratulate has an -ing inflection,
not an - ed inflection.
In the passive
construction in [2], we refer to Paul as
the AGENT. This is the one who performs the action of congratulating David.
Sometimes no agent is specified:
David was congratulated
We
refer to this as an AGENTLESS PASSIVE
5
Adjectives
Adjectives can be identified using
a number of formal criteria. However, we may begin by saying that they
typically describe an attribute of a noun:
cold weather large windows violent storms
Some adjectives can be
identified by their endings. Typical adjective endings include:
-able/-ible
achievable, capable, illegible, remarkable
-al biographical,
functional, internal, logical
-ful beautiful, careful,
grateful, harmful
-ic cubic, manic,
rustic, terrific
-ive attractive,
dismissive, inventive, persuasive
-less breathless,
careless, groundless, restless
-ous courageous,
dangerous, disastrous, fabulous
However, a large
number of very common adjectives cannot be identified in this way. They do not
have typical adjectival form:
bad |
distant |
quiet |
bright |
elementary |
real |
clever |
good |
red |
cold |
great |
silent |
common |
honest |
simple |
complete |
hot |
strange |
dark |
main |
wicked |
deep |
morose |
wide |
As this list
shows, adjectives are formally very diverse. However, they have a number of
characteristics which we can use to identify them.
5.1
Characteristics
of Adjectives
Adjectives can take a modifying word, such as very, extremely, or less,
before them:
very cold weather extremely large windows less
violent storms
Here, the
modifying word locates the adjective on a scale of comparison, at a position
higher or lower than the one indicated by the adjective alone.
This
characteristic is known as GRADABILITY. Most adjectives are gradable, though if
the adjective already denotes the highest position on a scale, then it is
non-gradable:
my main reason for coming ~*my very main reason for coming the principal
role in the play ~*the
very principal role in the play
As well as
taking modifying words like very and extremely,adjectives also take different
forms to indicate their position on a scale of comparison:
big bigger biggest
The lowest point
on the scale is known as the ABSOLUTE form, the middle point is known as the
COMPARATIVE form, and the highest point is known as the SUPERLATIVE form. Here
are some more examples:
Absolute Comparative Superlative
darker |
darkest |
|
new |
newer |
newest |
old |
older |
oldest |
young |
younger |
youngest |
In most cases,
the comparative is formed by adding -er ,
and the superlative is formed by adding -
est, to the absolute form. However, a number of very common adjectives are
irregular in this respect:
Absolute |
Comparative |
Superlative |
good |
better |
best |
bad |
worse |
worst |
far |
farther |
farthest |
Some adjectives form the
comparative and superlative using more and
most respectively:
Absolute Comparative Superlative
important more important most
important miserable more miserable most miserable
recent more recent most recent
5.2 Attributive and Predicative Adjectives
Most adjectives can occur both
before and after a noun:
the blue sea ~
the sea is blue
the old man ~ the man
is old
happy children ~ the children are happy
Adjectives in
the first position - before the noun - are called ATTRIBUTIVE adjectives. Those
in the second position - after the noun - are called PREDICATIVE adjectives.
Notice that predicative adjectives do not occur immediately after the noun. Instead, they follow a verb.
Sometimes an
adjective does occur immediately
after a noun, especially in certain institutionalised expressions:
the Governor
General the Princess Royal times past
We refer to
these as POSTPOSITIVE adjectives. Postposition is obligatory when the adjective
modifies a pronoun:
something useful everyone
present those responsible
Postpositive adjectives are commonly found together
with superlative, attributive adjectives: the shortest route possible
the worst conditions imaginable
the best hotel available
Most adjectives
can freely occur in both the attributive and the predicative positions.
However, a small number of adjectives are restricted to one position only. For
example, the adjective main (the main reason) can only occur in the
attributive position (predicative: *the reason is main).
Conversely, the adjective afraid (the child was afraid) can only occur predicatively
(attributive: *an
afraid child).
We have now
looked at the main criteria for the adjective class - gradability, comparative
and superlative forms, and the ability to occur attributively and
predicatively. Most adjectives fulfil all these criteria, and are known as
CENTRAL adjectives. Those which do not fulfil all the criteria are known as
PERIPHERAL adjectives.
We will now examine the adjective
class in more detail.
5.3 Inherent and Non-inherent Adjectives
Most attributive adjectives denote some attribute of the noun which they
modify. For instance, the phrase a red
car may be said to denote a car which
is red. In fact most adjective-noun sequences such as this can be loosely
reformulated in a similar way:
difficult questions
~questions which are difficult round glasses ~glasses which are
round
This applies
equally to postpositive adjectives:
something understood
~something which is understood
the people responsible
~the people who are responsible
In each case the adjective denotes an attribute or quality of the noun,
as the reformulations show. Adjectives of this type are known as INHERENT
adjectives. The attribute they denote is, as it were, inherent in the noun
which they modify.
However, not all
adjectives are related to the noun in the same way. For example, the adjective small in a small businessman does not describe an attribute of the
businessman. It cannot be reformulated as a
businessman who is small. Instead, it refers to a businessman whose business is small. We refer to adjectives of
this type as NON-INHERENT adjectives. They refer less directly to an attribute
of the noun than inherent adjectives do. Here are some more examples, showing
the contrast betwen inherent and non-inherent:
Inherent |
Non-inherent |
distant hills |
distant relatives |
a
complete chapter |
a complete
idiot |
a
heavy burden |
a heavy
smoker |
a
social survey |
a social
animal |
an
old man |
an old
friend |
5.4 Stative and Dynamic Adjectives
As their name suggests, STATIVE adjectives denote a state or condition,
which may generally be considered permanent, such as big, red, small. Stative adjectives cannot
normally be used in imperative constructions:
*Be big/red/small
Further, they cannot normally be used in progressive
constructions:
*He is being big/red/small
In contrast, DYNAMIC adjectives denote attributes which are, to some
extent at least, under the control of the one who possesses them. For instance,
brave denotes an attribute which may
not always be in evidence (unlike red,
for example), but which may be called upon as it is required. For this reason,
it is appropriate to use it in an imperative:
Be brave!
Dynamic
adjectives include:
calm careful cruel disruptive
foolish friendly good impatient
mannerly patient rude
shy suspicious tidy
vacuous vain
All dynamic
adjectives can be used in imperatives (Be
careful!, Don't be cruel!), and
they can also be used predicatively in progressive constructions:
Your son is
being disruptive in class My parents
are being foolish again We're being
very patient with you
The majority of
adjectives are stative. The stative/dynamic contrast, as it relates to
adjectives, is largely a semantic one, though as we have seen it also has
syntactic implications.
5.5
Nominal Adjectives
Certain
adjectives are used to denote a class by describing one of the attributes of
the class. For example, the poor denotes
a class of people who share a similar financial status. Other nominal
adjectives are:
the old
the sick
the wealthy the blind the innocent
A major subclass of nominal adjectives refers to
nationalities:
the French the British the Japanese
However, not all
nationalities have corresponding nominal adjectives. Many of them are denoted
by plural, proper nouns:
the Germans the Russians the Americans the
Poles
Nominal
adjectives do not refer exclusively to classes of people. Indeed some of them
do not denote classes at all:
the
opposite the contrary the good
Comparative
and superlative forms can also be nominal adjectives:
the best is yet to come the elder of the
two the greatest of these
the most important
among them
We refer to all
of these types as nominal adjectives because they share some of the
characteristics of nouns (hence `nominal')
and some of the characteristics of adjectives. They have the following nominal
characteristics:
·
they are preceded by a determiner (usually the
definite article the)
·
they can be modified by
adjectives (the gallant French, the
unfortunate poor) They have the following adjectival features:
·
they are gradable (the very old, the extremely wealthy)
·
many can take comparative and superlative
forms (the poorer, the poorest)
5.6 Adjectives and Nouns
We have seen that attributive
adjectives occur before a noun which they modify, for example, red
in red car. We need to distinguish these clearly from nouns which occur
in the same position, and
fulfil the same syntactic
function. Consider the following:
rally car saloon car family car
Here, the first
word modifies the second, that is, it tells us something further about the car.
For example, a rally car is a car which is driven in rallies. These modifiers
occur in the same position as red in
the example above, but they are not adjectives. We can show this by applying
our criteria for the adjective class.
Firstly, they do not take very:
*a very rally car
*a very saloon car
*a very family car
Secondly, they do not have
comparative or superlative forms:
*rallier *ralliest / *more rally
/ *most rally
*salooner *saloonest / *more
saloon / *most saloon
*familier *familiest / *more family / *most family And finally, they
cannot occur in predicative position:
*the car is rally
*the car is saloon
*the car is family
So although
these words occupy the typical adjective position, they are not adjectives.
They are nouns.
However, certain
adjectives are derived from nouns, and are known as DENOMINAL adjectives.
Examples include:
a mathematical puzzle [`a puzzle based on
mathematics'] a biological experiment
[`an experiment in biology']
a wooden boat [`a boat made of
wood'] Denominals include adjectives which refer to nationality:
a Russian lady [`a lady who comes from
Russia']
German goods [`goods produced in Germany']
Denominal
adjectives of this type should be carefully distinguished from nominal
adjectives denoting nationalities. Compare:
Nominal
Adjective: The French are noted for
their wines Denominal Adjective: The French
people are noted for their wines
5.7 Participial Adjectives
We saw in an
earlier section that many adjectives can be identified by their endings.
Another major subclass of adjectives can also be formally distinguished by
endings, this time by -ed or -ing endings:
-ed form |
computerized, determined, excited, misunderstood,
renowned, self-centred, talented, unknown |
-ing form |
annoying, exasperating, frightening, gratifying,
misleading, thrilling, time- consuming, worrying |
Remember
that some -ed forms, such as
misunderstood and unknown, do not end in -ed
at all. This is simply a cover term for this form. Adjectives with -ed or -ing endings are known as PARTICIPIAL ADJECTIVES, because they have
the same endings as verb participles (he was training for the Olympics, he had trained for the Olympics). In some cases there is a verb which
corresponds to these adjectives (to
annoy, to computerize, to excite, etc), while in others there is no
corresponding verb (*to renown, *to self-centre, *to talent). Like other adjectives, participial adjectives can
usually be modified by very, extremely, or less (very determined, extremely self- centred, less frightening, etc). They can also
take more and most to form comparatives and superlatives (annoying, more annoying, most annoying). Finally, most participial
adjectives can be used both attributively and predicatively:
Attributive |
Predicative |
That's
an irritating noise |
That noise is irritating |
This
is an exciting film |
This film is exciting |
He's a talented
footballer |
That footballer is talented |
Many participial
adjectives, which have no corresponding verb, are formed by combining a noun
with a participle:
alcohol-based chemicals battle-hardened soldiers drug-induced
coma energy-saving devices fact-finding mission
purpose-built accommodation
These, too,
can be used predicatively (the chemicals
are alcohol-based, the soldiers were
battle- hardened, etc).
When participial
adjectives are used predicatively, it may sometimes be difficult to distinguish
between adjectival and verbal uses:
[1] the
workers are striking
In the absence of any further context, the grammatical status of striking is indeterminate here. The
following expansions illustrate possible adjectival [1a] and verbal [1b]
readings of [1]:
[1a] the workers are very striking in their new uniforms
(=`impressive',
`conspicuous')
[1b] the workers are striking outside
the factory gates (=`on strike') Consider the following pair:
[2]
the noise is
annoying
[3]
the noise is annoying the neighbours In [2], we can
modify annoying using very:
[2a] the noise is (very) annoying
But
we cannot modify it in the same way in [3]:
[3a] *the noise is (very) annoying the neighbours
The
acceptability of [2a] indicates that annoying
is an adjective in this construction. In [3], the verbal nature of annoying is indicated by the fact that
we cannot add very , as in [3a]. It
is further indicated by the presence of the
neighbours (the direct object) after annoying.
Notice also that we can turn [3] into a passive sentence (the neighbours were annoyed by the noise). In this case,
annoying is the main verb of the
sentence, and it is preceded by the progressive auxiliary verb is. In [2], there is only one verb, the
main verb is.
We can distinguish between the
following pairs using the same criteria:
Adjectival |
Verbal |
This
film is terrifying |
This film is terrifying the children |
Your
comments are alarming |
Your comments are alarming the people |
The
defendant's answers were misleading |
The defendant's answers
were misleading the jury |
We can also
identify -ing forms as verbal if it
is possible to change the -ing form
into a non- progressive verb:
Progressive |
Non-progressive |
The
children are dancing |
The children dance |
My
eyes are stinging |
My eyes sting |
The
wood is drying |
The wood dries |
Compare these changes from
progressive to non-progressive with the following:
the work is rewarding ~*the
work rewards
the job was exacting ~*the
job exacted
your paper was interesting
~*your paper interested
In these
instances, the inability to produce fully acceptable non-progressive sentences
indicates adjectival use.
Similar indeterminacy occurs with -ed
forms. Again, we can generally use very
to determine whether the -ed word
is adjectival or verbal:
The bomb was detonated |
~*The bomb was very detonated |
This
document is hand-written |
~*This document is very hand-written |
My house
was built in only twelve weeks |
~*My house
was very built in only twelve weeks |
Ten
people were killed |
~*Ten people were very killed |
The inability to
supply very in these cases indicates
a verbal rather than an adjectival construction. However, this test is less
reliable with -ed forms than it is
with -ing forms, since very can sometimes be supplied in both
the adjectival and the verbal constructions:
Adjectival |
Verbal |
I
was embarrassed I was very embarrassed |
I was embarrassed
by your behaviour I was very embarrassed
by your behaviour |
She
was surprised She was very surprised |
She was surprised
by my reaction She was very surprised
by my reaction |
The presence of a by-agent
phrase (by your behaviour, by my reaction) indicates that the -ed form is verbal. Conversely, the
presence of a complement, such as a that-clause,
indicates that it is adjectival. Compare the following two constructions:
Adjectival: The jury was convinced that the defendant was
innocent
Verbal: The jury was convinced by the lawyer's argument
Here are some
further examples of adjectival constructions (with complements) and verbal
constructions (with by-agent
phrases):
Adjectival |
Verbal |
I
was delighted to meet you again |
I was delighted
by his compliments |
John
is terrified of losing his job |
John is terrified
by his boss |
I
was frightened that I'd be late |
I was frightened
by your expression |
I
was disappointed to hear your
decision |
I was disappointed
by your decision |
If the -ed form is verbal, we can change the
passive construction in which it occurs into an active one:
Passive: |
I was delighted
by his compliments |
Active: |
His compliments delighted me |
For more on active and passive
constructions, see...
As we have seen,
discriminating between adjectival and verbal constructions is sometimes
facilitated by the presence of additional context, such as by-agent phrases or adjective complements. However, when none of
these indicators is present, grammatical indeterminacy remains. Consider the
following examples from conversational English:
And you know if
you don't know the simple command how to get out of something you're sunk [S1A-005-172]
But that's convenient because
it's edged with wood isn't it
[S1A-007-97]
With -ed and -ing participial forms, there is no grammatical indeterminacy if
there is no corresponding verb. For example, in the job was time-consuming, and the
allegations were unfounded, the participial forms are adjectives.
Similarly,
the problem does not arise if the main verb is not be. For example, the participial forms in this book seems boring, and he
remained offended are all adjectives. Compare the following:
John felt depressed
5.8 The Ordering of Adjectives
When two or
more adjectives come before a noun, their relative order is fixed to a certain
degree. This means, for instance, that while complex mathematical studies is grammatically acceptable, mathematical complex studies is less so.
Similarly:
a huge red bomber |
~*a red huge
bomber |
a
long narrow road |
~*a narrow
long road |
the
lovely little black Japanese box |
~*the Japanese
black little lovely box |
Here we will
discuss some of the most common sequences which occur, though these should not
be seen as ordering rules. Counter examples can often be found quite easily.
Central
adjectives, as we saw earlier, are adjectives which fulfil all the criteria for
the adjective class. In this sense, they are more "adjectival" than,
say, denominal adjectives, which also have some of the properties of nouns.
This distinction
has some significance in the ordering of adjectives. In general, the more
adjectival a word is, the farther from the noun it will be. Conversely, the
less adjectival it is (the more nominal), the nearer to the noun it will be.
The relative order of these adjective types, then, is:
Sequence (1): CENTRAL --
DENOMINAL -- NOUN
This
is the ordering found in complex
mathematical studies, for instance, and also in the following examples:
expensive Russian dolls heavy woollen clothes huge
polar bears
Colour
adjectives are also central adjectives, but if they co-occur with another central
adjective, they come after it:
Sequence (2): CENTRAL -- COLOUR
-- NOUN
expensive green dolls heavy black clothes huge
white bears
and before denominal adjectives:
Sequence (3): COLOUR --
DENOMINAL -- NOUN
green Russian dolls black woollen clothes white
polar bears
Participial adjectives also
follow central adjectives:
Sequence (4): CENTRAL --
PARTICIPIAL -- DENOMINAL -- NOUN
expensive carved Russian dolls heavy knitted woollen clothes huge dancing polar bears
(1) - (4) account for many sequences of up to three adjectives, in which
each adjective is a different type. In practice it is rare to find more than
three attributive adjectives together, especially if they are all different
types. However, such a sequence may occur:
certain expensive green Russian dolls Here
the sequence is:
Sequence (5): NON-GRADABLE --
CENTRAL -- COLOUR -- DENOMINAL -- NOUN
Non-gradable
adjectives, in fact, are always first in an adjective sequence. Here are some
more examples:
Sequence (5a): NON-GRADABLE --
CENTRAL -- NOUN
certain
difficult problems
Sequence (5b): NON-GRADABLE --
PARTICIPIAL -- NOUN
sheer unadulterated nonsense
Sequence (5c): NON-GRADABLE --
DENOMINAL -- NOUN
major medical advances
So far we have
looked at sequences in which each adjective is a different type. However, we
very often find adjectives of the same type occurring together:
big old buildings beautiful little flowers rich young people
Here all the
adjectives are central adjectives, and in sequences like these it is much more
difficult to determine the general principles governing their order. Several
schemes have been proposed, though none is completely satisfactory or
comprehensive.
The ordering of
adjectives is influenced to some degree by the presence of premodification. If
one or more of the adjectives in a sequence is premodified, say, by very, then it generally comes at the
start of the sequence.
The
laryngograph provides us with a very accurate
non-invasive physical measure of voice [S2A-056-95]
It would be unusual, perhaps, to
find very accurate elsewhere in this
sequence:
?The
laryngograph provides us with a non-invasive very accurate physical measure of voice
?The
laryngograph provides us with a non-invasive physical very accurate measure of voice
Conversely,
adjective order restricts the degree to which attributive adjectives may be
premodified. Consider the following:
a wealthy
young businessman
a very wealthy
young businessman
We cannot
modify young in this example, while
keeping wealthy and young in the same relative order:
*a wealthy very
young businessman
Nor can we move young to the
first position and modify it there, while retaining the same degree of
acceptability:
?a very young
wealthy businessman
6
Adverbs
Adverbs are used to modify a
verb, an adjective, or another adverb:
[1]
Mary sings beautifully
[2] David is
extremely clever
[3] This car
goes incredibly fast
In [1], the adverb beautifully
tells us how Mary sings. In [2], extremely
tells us the degree to which David is clever. Finally, in [3], the adverb incredibly tells us how fast the car goes.
Before
discussing the meaning of adverbs, however, we will identify some of their
formal characteristics.
6.1 Formal Characteristics of Adverbs
From our
examples above, you can see that many adverbs end in -ly. More precisely, they are formed by adding -ly to an adjective:
Adjective |
slow |
quick |
soft |
sudden |
gradual |
Adverb |
slowly |
quickly |
softly |
suddenly |
gradually |
Because of
their distinctive endings, these adverbs are known as -LY ADVERBS. However, by no means all adverbs end in -ly. Note also that some adjectives also
end in -ly, including costly, deadly, friendly, kindly, likely,
lively, manly, and timely.
Like adjectives, many adverbs
are GRADABLE, that is, we can modify them using very or
extremely:
softly |
very softly |
suddenly |
very suddenly |
slowly |
extremely slowly |
The
modifying words very and extremely are themselves adverbs. They
are called DEGREE ADVERBS because they specify the degree to which an adjective
or another adverb applies. Degree adverbs include almost, barely, entirely, highly, quite, slightly, totally, and utterly.
Degree adverbs are not gradable (*extremely very).
Like adjectives,
too, some adverbs can take COMPARATIVE and SUPERLATIVE forms, with -er and - est:
John works hard
-- Mary works harder -- I work hardest
However, the majority of adverbs do not take these
endings. Instead, they form the comparative using more and the superlative using most:
Adverb |
Comparative |
Superlative |
recently |
more recently |
most recently |
effectively |
more
effectively |
most
effectively |
frequently |
more
frequently |
most
frequently |
In the formation of comparatives
and superlatives, some adverbs are irregular:
Adverb |
Comparative |
Superlative |
well |
better |
best |
badly |
worse |
worst |
little |
less |
least |
much |
more |
most |
6.2 Adverbs and Adjectives
Adverbs and adjectives have important characteristics in common -- in
particular their gradability, and the fact that they have comparative and
superlative forms. However, an important distinguishing feature is that adverbs
do not modify nouns, either attributively or predicatively:
Adjective |
Adverb |
David
is a happy child |
*David is a happily child |
David
is happy |
*David is happily |
The following
words, together with their comparative and superlative forms, can be both
adverbs and adjectives:
The following sentences
illustrate the two uses of early:
Adjective |
Adverb |
I'll
catch the early train |
I awoke early
this morning |
The comparative better and the superlative best, as well as some words denoting
time intervals (daily, weekly, monthly), can also be adverbs or adjectives, depending on how they
are used.
We have
incorporated some of these words into the following exercise. See if you can
distinguish between the adverbs and the adjectives.
Although endings, gradability and comparison allow us to identify many
adverbs, there still remains a very large number of them which cannot be
identified in this way. In fact, taken as a whole, the adverb class is the most
diverse of all the word classes, and its members exhibit a very wide range of
forms and functions. Many semantic classifications of adverbs have been made,
but here we will concentrate on just three of the most distinctive classes,
known collectively as circumstantial adverbs.
6.3 Circumstantial Adverbs
Many adverbs convey information about the manner, time, or place of an
event or action. MANNER adverbs tell us how
an action is or should be performed:
She sang loudly in the bath The sky quickly grew dark They whispered softly
I
had to run fast to catch the bus
TIME
adverbs denote not only specific times but also frequency:
I'll be checking out tomorrow
Give it back, now!
John rarely rings
any more
I watch television sometimes
And finally, PLACE adverbs
indicate where:
Put the box there, on
the table I've left my gloves somewhere
These three
adverb types -- manner, time, and place -- are collectively known as
CIRCUMSTANTIAL ADVERBS. They express one of the circumstances relating
to an event or action
- how it happened (manner), when it happened (time), or where it happened (place).
6.4 Additives, Exclusives, and Particularizers
Additives "add" two or
more items together, emphasizing that they are all to be considered equal:
[1]
Lynn's prewar success had
been as a light historical novelist; he employed similar fanciful ideas in his
war novels [...] Joseph Hocking's war novels are also dominated by romance and adventure [W2A-009-40ff]
[2]
German firms have an existing
advantage as a greater number of their managers have technical or engineering
degrees. Japanese managers, too, have
technical qualifications of a high order. [W2A-011-51ff]
In [1], the
adverb also points to the
similarities between the war novels of Lynn and those of Hocking. In [2], the
adverb too functions in a similar
way, emphasizing the fact that the qualifications of Japanese managers are
similar to those of German managers.
In contrast with
additives, EXCLUSIVE adverbs focus attention on what follows them, to the
exclusion of all other possibilities:
[3]
It's just
a question of how we organise it [S1B-075-68]
[4]
The federal convention [...]
comes together solely for the purpose
of electing the president [S2B-021-99]
In [3], just excludes all other potential
questions from consideration, while in [4], solely
points out the fact that the federal convention has no other function apart
from electing the president. Other exclusives include alone, exactly, merely, and simply.
PARTICULARIZERS
also focus attention on what follows them, but they do not exclude other
possibilities:
[5]
The pastoralists are particularly found in Africa [S2A-047-3]
[6]
Now this book is mostly about what they call modulation [S1A-045-167]
In [5], it is
implied that Africa is not the only place where pastoralists live. While most
of them live there, some of them live elsewhere. Sentence [6] implies that most
of the book is about modulation, though it deals with other, unspecified topics
as well.
Other particularizers include largely, mainly, primarily, and predominantly.
A special subclass of adverbs includes a set of words beginning with wh-. The most common are when, where, and why, though the set also includes whence, whereby, wherein, and whereupon.
To this set we add the word how, and
we refer to the whole set as WH- ADVERBS.
Some members of the set can introduce an interrogative sentence:
When are you going to New York?
Where did you leave the car?
Why did he resign?
How did you become interested in theatre?
They can also introduce various
types of clause:
This is the town where Shakespeare
was born I've no idea how it works
6.6
Sentence Adverbs
We conclude by looking at a set of adverbs which qualify a whole
sentence, and not just a part of it. Consider the following:
Honestly, it doesn't matter
Here
the sentence adverb honestly modifies
the whole sentence, and it expresses the speaker's opinion about what is being
said (When I say it doesn't matter, I am
speaking honestly). Here are some more examples:
Clearly, he has no excuse for such
behaviour Frankly, I don't care about
your problems Unfortunately, no
refunds can be given
Some sentence adverbs link a
sentence with a preceding one:
England played
well in the first half. However, in
the second half their weaknesses were revealed.
Other sentence adverbs of this type are accordingly, consequently, hence, moreover,
similarly, and
therefore.
7
Prepositions
Prepositions cannot be distinguished by any formal
features. A list of prepositions will illustrate this point:
across, after,
at, before, by, during, from, in, into, of, on, to, under, with, without
We can, say, however, that
prepositions typically come before a noun:
across town after class at home
before Tuesday
by Shakespeare
for lunch in London on fire
to school
with pleasure
The noun does not necessarily come immediately after the preposition,
however, since determiners and adjectives can intervene:
after the storm
on white horses
under the old regime
Whether or not there are any intervening determiners or adjectives,
prepositions are almost always followed by a noun. In fact, this is so typical
of prepositions that if they are not followed by a noun, we call them
"stranded" prepositions:
Preposition |
Stranded Preposition |
John
talked about the new film |
This is the
film John talked about |
Prepositions are invariable in
their form, that is, they do not take any inflections.
7.1 Complex Prepositions
The prepositions
which we have looked at so far have all consisted of a single word, such as in, of,
at, and to. We refer to these as SIMPLE PREPOSITIONS.
COMPLEX
PREPOSITIONS consist of two- or three-word combinations acting as a single
unit. Here are some examples:
according to due
to
Like simple prepositions, these
two-word combinations come before a noun:
according to Shakespeare contrary
to my advice due to illness
Three-word combinations often
have the following pattern:
Simple Preposition + Noun + Simple
Preposition
We can see this pattern in the
following examples:
in aid of
on behalf of in front of
in accordance with in line with
in line with in relation to
with reference to with respect to by means of
Again, these combinations come
before a noun:
in aid of charity
in front of the window
in line with inflation
7.2 Marginal Prepositions
A number of
prepositions have affinities with other word classes. In particular, some
prepositions are verbal in form:
Following his resignation, the minister
moved to the country I am writing to you regarding
your overdraft
The whole team was there, including John
We refer to these as MARGINAL
PREPOSITIONS. Other marginal prepositions include:
concerning, considering, excluding, given, granted, pending
Non-verbal
marginal prepositions include worth (it's
worth ten pounds) and minus (ten minus two is eight).
8 Conjunctions
Conjunctions are used to express
a connection between words. The most familiar conjunctions are
and, but, and or:
Paul
and David cold and wet tired but happy
slowly but surely tea or coffee
hot or cold
They can also connect longer
units:
Paul plays
football and David plays chess I play
tennis but I don't play well
We can eat now or we can wait till later
There are two
types of conjunctions. COORDINATING CONJUNCTIONS (or simply COORDINATORS)
connect elements of `equal' syntactic status:
Paul and David
I play tennis but I don't play well meat or fish
Items which
are connected by a coordinator are known as CONJOINS. So in I play tennis but I don't play well, the
conjoins are [I play tennis] and [ I don't play well].
On the other hand,
SUBORDINATING CONJUNCTIONS (or SUBORDINATORS) connect elements of
`unequal' syntactic status:
I left early because I had an interview the next day
We visited
Madame Tussaud's while we were in
London I'll be home at nine if I can
get a taxi
Other
subordinating conjunctions include although,
because, before, since, till, unless, whereas, whether
Coordination and
subordination are quite distinct concepts in grammar. Notice, for example, that
coordinators must appear between the
conjoins:
[Paul
plays football] and [David plays
chess]
~*And [David plays chess] [Paul plays football]
However, we can
reverse the order of the conjoins, provided we keep the coordinator between
them:
[David plays chess] and [Paul plays football]
In contrast with this,
subordinators do not have to occur between the items they connect::
I left early because I had an interview the next day
~Because I had an interview the next day, I left early
But if we reverse the order of the
items, we either change the meaning completely:
I left early because I had an interview the next day
~I had an interview the next
day because I left early
or we produce a very dubious
sentence:
I'll be home at nine if I can get a taxi
~?I can get a taxi if I'll be home at nine
This shows that items
linked by a subordinator have a very specific relationship to each other -- it
is a relationship of syntactic dependency. There is no syntactic dependency in
the relationship between conjoins. We will further explore this topic when we
look at the grammar of clauses.
8.1 Coordination Types
Conjoins are
usually coordinated using one of the coordinators and, but, or or. In [1], the bracketed conjoins are
coordinated using and:
[1] [Quickly]
and [resolutely], he strode into the bank
This type of coordination, with a coordinator
present, is called SYNDETIC COORDINATION.
Coordination can also occur without the presence of
a coordinator, as in [2]:
[2] [Quickly],
[resolutely], he strode into the bank
No
coordinator is present here, but the conjoins are still coordinated. This is
known as ASYNDETIC COORDINATION.
When three
or more conjoins are coordinated, a coordinator will usually appear between the
final two conjoins only:
[3] I need
[bread], [cheese], [eggs], and [milk]
This is
syndetic coordination, since a coordinating conjunction is present. It would be
unusual to find a coordinator between each conjoin:
[3a] I need
[bread] and [cheese] and [eggs] and [milk]
This is
called POLYSYNDETIC COORDINATION. It is sometimes used for effect, for instance
to express continuation:
[4] This
play will [run] and [run] and [run]
[5] He just
[talks] and [talks] and [talks]
8.2
False Coordination
Coordinators are sometimes used without performing any strictly
coordinating role: I'll come when I'm good and ready
Here, the adjectives good and ready are not really being coordinated
with each other. If they were, the sentence would mean something like:
I'll come [when I'm good] and [when I'm ready]
Clearly, this is
not the meaning which good and ready conveys.
Instead, good and intensifies the
meaning of ready. We might rephrase
the sentence as
I'll come when I'm completely ready.
Good and ready is an example of FALSE
COORDINATION -- using a coordinator without any coordinating role. It is
sometimes called PSEUDO-COORDINATION.
False coordination can also be
found in informal expressions using try
and:
Please try and
come early
I'll try and ring
you from the office
Here, too,
no real coordination is taking place. The first sentence, for instance, does
not mean Please try, and please come
early. Instead, it is semantically equivalent to Please try to come early.
In informal spoken English, and and but are often
used as false coordinators, without any real coordinating role. The following
extract from a conversation illustrates this:
Speaker A: Well he told me it's this
super high-flying computer software stuff. I'm sure it's the old job he used to
have cleaning them
Speaker B: But it went off okay last night then did it? Did you have a good
turnout? [S1A-005- 95ff]
Here, the word but used by Speaker B does not
coordinate any conjoins. Instead, it initiates her utterance, and introduces a
completely new topic.
9
Minor
word classes
We have now looked at the seven major word classes in English. Most words
can be assigned to at least one of these classes. However, there are some words
which will not fit the criteria for any of them. Consider, for example, the
word hello. It is clearly not a noun,
or an adjective, or a verb, or indeed any of the classes we have looked at. It
belongs to a minor word class, which we call formulaic expressions.
9.1 Formulaic Expressions
To express greetings, farewell, thanks, or apologies, we use a wide range
of FORMULAIC EXPRESSIONS. These may consist of a single word or of several
words acting as a unit. Here are some examples:
bye goodbye hello
farewell hi
so long
excuse me thanks thank you thanks a lot sorry pardon
Some formulaic expressions
express agreement or disagreement with a previous speaker:
yes, yeah, no,
okay, right, sure
INTERJECTIONS generally occur only in spoken English, or
in the representation of speech in novels. They include the following:
ah, eh, hmm,
oh, ouch, phew, shit, tsk, uhm, yuk
Interjections
express a wide range of emotions, including surprise (oh!), exasperation (shit!),
and disgust (yuk!).
Formulaic
expressions, including interjections, are unvarying in their form, that is,
they do not take any inflections.
We have seen that the word there is
an adverb, in sentences such as: You can't park there
I went there last
year
Specifically, it is an adverb of
place in these examples.
However, the
word there has another use. As
EXISTENTIAL THERE, it often comes at
the start of a sentence:
There is a fly in my soup
There were six errors in your essay
Existential there is most commonly followed by a
form of the verb be. When it is used
in a question, it follows the verb:
Is there a problem with your car? Was there a storm last night?
The two uses of there can occur in the same sentence:
There is a parking space there
In this example, the first there is existential there, and the second is an adverb.
9.3
Uses of It
In the section
on pronouns, we saw that the word it is
a third person singular pronoun. However, this word also has other roles which
are not related to its pronominal use. We look at some of these other uses
here.
When we talk about time or the
weather, we use sentences such as:
What time is it? It
is four o'clock
It's going to rain
Here, we cannot
identify precisely what it refers to.
It has a rather vague reference, and we call this DUMMY IT or PROP IT. Dummy it is also used, equally vaguely, in
other expressions:
Hold it!
Take it easy!
Can you make it to my party?
It is sometimes used to "anticipate" something which
appears later in the same sentence:
It's great to see you
It's a pity you can't come to my party
In
the first example, it "anticipates"
to see you. We can remove it from the sentence and replace it with
to see you:
To see you is great
Because of its
role in this type of sentence, we call this ANTICIPATORY IT. See also: Cleft
Sentences
10 Introduces phrases
We have now
completed the first level of grammatical analysis, in which we looked at words
individually and classified them according to certain criteria. This
classification is important because, as we'll see, it forms the basis of the
next level of analysis, in which we consider units which may be larger than individual words, but are
smaller than sentences. In this section we will be looking at PHRASES.
10.1 Defining a Phrase
When we looked
at nouns and pronouns, we said that a pronoun can sometimes replace a noun in a
sentence. One of the examples we used was this:
[Children]
should watch less television
~[They] should watch less television
Here it is certainly true that
the pronoun they replaces the noun children. But consider:
[The children] should watch less television
~[They] should watch less television
In this example, they does not
replace children. Instead, it
replaces the children, which is a unit
consisting of a determiner and a noun. We refer to this unit as a NOUN PHRASE
(NP), and we define it as any unit in which the central element is a noun. Here
is another example:
I like [the
title of your book]
~I like [it]
In this case, the pronoun it replaces
not just a noun but a five-word noun phrase, the title of your book. So instead of saying that pronouns can
replace nouns, it is more accurate to say that they can replace noun phrases.
We refer to
the central element in a phrase as the HEAD of the phrase. In the noun phrase the children, the Head is children. In the noun phrase the title of your book, the Head is title.
Noun phrases do
not have to contain strings of words. In fact, they can contain just one word,
such as the word children in children should watch less television.
This is also a phrase, though it contains only a Head. At the level of word
class, of course, we would call children a
plural, common noun. But in a phrase-level analysis, we call children on its own a noun phrase. This
is not simply a matter of terminology -- we call it a noun phrase because it
can be expanded to form longer strings which are more clearly noun phrases.
From now on in
the Internet Grammar, we will be using this phrase-level terminology.
Furthermore, we will delimit phrases by bracketing them, as we have done in the
examples above.
10.2 The Basic Structure of a Phrase
Phrases consist
minimally of a Head. This means that in a one-word phrase like [children], the
Head is children. In longer phrases,
a string of elements may appear before the Head:
[the small children]
For now, we will refer to this
string simply as the pre-Head string.
A string of
elements may also appear after the Head, and we will call this the post-Head string: [the small children in class 5]
So we have a basic three-part
structure:
Head |
post-Head string |
|
[the small |
children |
in class 5] |
Of these three
parts, only the Head is obligatory. It is the only part which cannot be omitted
from the phrase. To illustrate this, let's omit each part in turn:
pre-Head string |
Head |
post-Head string |
[-- |
children |
in class 5] |
*[the small |
-- |
in class 5] |
[the small |
children |
--] |
Pre-Head and
post-Head strings can be omitted, while leaving a complete noun phrase. We can
even omit the pre- and post-Head strings at the same time, leaving only the
Head:
pre-Head string |
Head |
post-Head string |
[-- |
children |
--] |
This is still a complete noun
phrase.
However, when
the Head is omitted, we're left with an incomplete phrase (*the small in class five). This provides
a useful method of identifying the Head of a phrase. In general, the Head is
the only obligatory part of a phrase.
10.3 More Phrase Types
Just as a noun
functions as the Head of a noun phrase, a verb functions as the Head of a verb
phrase, and an adjective functions as the Head of an adjective phrase, and so
on. We recognise five phrase types in all:
Head |
Example |
|
Noun
Phrase |
Noun |
[the children
in class 5] |
Verb
Phrase |
Verb |
[play
the piano] |
Adjective
Phrase |
Adjective |
[delighted
to meet you] |
Adverb
Phrase |
Adverb |
[very quickly] |
Prepositional
Phrase |
Preposition |
[in the
garden] |
For convenience, we will use the
following abbreviations for the phrase types:
Phrase Type |
Abbreviation |
Noun Phrase |
NP |
Verb Phrase |
VP |
Adjective Phrase |
AP |
Adverb Phrase |
AdvP |
Prepositional Phrase |
PP |
Using these
abbreviations, we can now label phrases as well as bracket them. We do this by
putting the appropriate label inside the opening bracket:
[NP the small children
in class 5]
Now we will say a little more
about each of the five phrase types.
10.4 Noun Phrase (NP)
As we've seen, a noun phrase has a noun as its Head.
Determiners and adjective phrases usually constitute the pre-Head string:
[NP the children]
[NP happy children]
[NP the happy children]
In theory at least, the post-Head
string in an NP can be indefinitely long:
[NP the dog that
chased the cat that killed the mouse that ate the cheese that was made from the
milk that came from the cow that...]
Fortunately, they are rarely as
long as this in real use.
The Head of an
NP does not have to be a common or a proper noun. Recall that pronouns are a
subclass of nouns. This means that pronouns, too, can function as the Head of
an NP:
[NP I] like coffee
The waitress
gave [NP me] the wrong dessert [NP This] is my car
If the Head is a
pronoun, the NP will generally consist of the Head only. This is because
pronouns do not take determiners or adjectives, so there will be no pre-Head
string. However, with some pronouns, there may be a post-Head string:
[NP Those who arrive late] cannot be admitted
until the interval
Similarly,
numerals, as a subclass of nouns, can be the Head of an NP: [NP Two of my guests] have arrived
[NP The first to arrive] was John
10.5 Verb Phrase (VP)
In a VERB PHRASE (VP), the Head
is always a verb. The pre-Head string, if any, will be a
`negative' word such as not [1] or never [2], or an adverb phrase [3]:
[1] [VP not compose an aria]
[2] [VP
never compose an aria]
[3] Paul [VP
deliberately broke the window]
Many verb Heads must be followed by a post-Head string:
My son [VP made a
cake] -- (compare: *My son made) We
[VP keep pigeons] -- (compare: *We keep)
I [VP recommend
the fish] -- (compare: *I recommend)
Verbs which
require a post-Head string are called TRANSITIVE verbs. The post-Head string,
in these examples, is called the DIRECT OBJECT.
In contrast, some verbs are never followed by a direct object:
Susan [VP smiled]
The professor [VP yawned]
These are known as INTRANSITIVE
VERBS.
However, most
verbs in English can be both transitive and intransitive, so it is perhaps more
accurate to refer to transitive and intransitive uses of a verb. The following examples show the two uses of the
same verb:
Intransitive: David smokes
Transitive: David smokes cigars
We will return to the structure
of verb phrases in a later section.
10.6 Adjective Phrase (AP)
In an
ADJECTIVE PHRASE (AP), the Head word is an adjective. Here are some examples:
Susan is [AP clever]
The doctor is [AP very late]
My sister is [AP fond of animals]
The pre-Head string in an AP is
most commonly an adverb phrase such as very
or extremely.
Adjective Heads may be followed
by a post-Head string:
[AP happy to meet you] [AP ready to go]
[AP afraid of the dark]
A small number of adjective
Heads must be followed by a post-Head
string. The adjective Head
fond is one of these. Compare:
My sister is [AP fond of animals]
*My sister is [fond]
10.7 Adverb Phrase (AdvP)
In an ADVERB
PHRASE, the Head word is an adverb. Most commonly, the pre-Head string is
another adverb phrase:
He graduated
[AdvP very recently] She left [AdvP quite
suddenly]
In AdvPs, there
is usually no post-Head string, but here's a rare example: [AdvP Unfortunately for him], his wife came home early
10.8 Prepositional Phrase (PP)
PREPOSITIONAL
PHRASES usually consist of a Head -- a preposition -- and a post-Head string
only. Here are some examples:
[PP through the window] [PP over the bar]
[PP across the line] [PP after midnight]
This makes PPs
easy to recognise -- they nearly always begin with a preposition (the Head). A
pre- Head string is rarely present, but here are some examples:
[PP
straight through the window] [PP right
over the bar]
[PP just after midnight]
10.9 Phrases within Phrases
We will conclude
this introduction to phrases by looking briefly at phrases within phrases.
Consider the NP:
[NP small children]
It consists of a
Head children and a pre-Head string small. Now small is an adjective, so it is the Head of its own adjective
phrase. We know this because it could be expanded to form a longer string:
very small children
Here,
the adjective Head small has its own
pre-Head string very:
[AP very small]
So
in small children, we have an AP small embedded with the NP small children. We represent this as
follows:
[NP [AP small] children]
All but the
simplest phrases will contain smaller phrases within them. Here's another
example: [PP across the road]
Here, the Head
is across, and the post-Head string
is the road. Now we know that the road is itself an NP -- its Head is road, and it has a pre-Head string the. So we have an NP within the PP:
[PP across [NP the road]]
When you examine phrases,
remember to look out for other phrases within them.
11 Clauses and sentences
So far we have been looking at phrases more or less in isolation. In real
use, of course, they occur in isolation only in very restricted circumstances.
For example, we find isolated NPs in public signs and notices:
[Exit]
[Sale]
[Restricted Area] [Hyde Park]
We sometimes use isolated phrases
in spoken English, especially in responses to questions:
Q: What would
you like to drink? A: [NP Coffee]
Q: How are you today?
A: [AP Fine]
Q: Where did you
park the car? A: [PP Behind the house]
In more general use, however,
phrases are integrated into longer units, which we call CLAUSES:
Q: What would you like to drink? A: [I'd like coffee]
Q: How are you today?
A: [I'm fine]
Q: Where did you park the car?
A: [I parked the car behind the
house]
11.1 The Clause Hierarchy
The clause I'd like coffee is a SUBORDINATE CLAUSE
within the sentence I think I'd like
coffee. We refer to this larger clause as the MATRIX CLAUSE:
The matrix
clause is not subordinate to any other, so it is, in fact, co-extensive with
the sentence. We say that the matrix clause is SUPERORDINATE to the subordinate
clause.
The terms subordinate and superordinate are relative terms.
They describe the relationship between clauses in what is called the CLAUSE
HIERARCHY. We can illustrate what this means by looking at a slightly more
complicated example:
He said I think
I'd like coffee Here the matrix clause is:
He said I think I'd like coffee
This matrix clause contains two
subordinate clauses, which we'll refer to as Sub1 and Sub2:
Sub1 is both subordinate and superordinate. It is
subordinate in relation to the matrix clause, and it is superordinate in
relation to Sub2.
Subordinate and superordinate, then, are not absolute terms. They describe how
clauses are arranged hierarchically relative to each other.
We can bracket
and label clauses in the same way as phrases. We will use the following
abbreviations:
Matrix Clause: MC
Subordinate Clause: SubC
Applying these labels and
brackets to our first example, we get:
[MC I
think [SubC I'd like coffee]]
Just as we've
seen with phrases, we can have embedding in clauses too. Here, the subordinate
clause is embedded within the matrix clause.
There is a
greater degree of embedding in our second example, where there are two
subordinate clauses, one within the other:
[MC He
said [SubC I think [SubC I'd like coffee]]]
11.2 Finite and Nonfinite Clauses
As a working
definition, let us say that clauses contain at least a verb phrase: [MC [VP Stop]]
[MC David [VP composed an aria] when he was twelve] [MC My solicitor [VP sent
me a letter] yesterday]
As these examples show, clauses can also contain many
other elements, but for now we will concentrate on the VP. We have already seen
that verbs (and therefore the VPs that contain them) are either FINITE or
NONFINITE, so we can use this distinction to classify clauses. Clauses are
either finite or nonfinite.
Finite verb phrases carry
tense, and the clauses containing them are FINITE CLAUSES:
[1]
She writes
home every day (finite clause -- present tense verb)
[2] She wrote home yesterday (finite clause --
past tense verb)
On the other hand, nonfinite
verb phrases do not carry tense. Their main verb is either a to-
infinitive [3], a bare infinitive
[4], an -ed form [5], or an -ing form [6]:
[3]
David loves [to play the piano]
[4] We made
[David play the piano]
[5] [Written in 1864], it soon became a
classic
[6]
[Leaving home] can be very traumatic These are NONFINITE CLAUSES.
Matrix clauses
are always finite, as in [1] and [2]. However, they may contain nonfinite
subordinate clauses within them. For example:
[MC David loves [SubC to
play the piano]]
Here we have a
finite matrix clause -- its main verb loves
has the present tense form. Within it, there is a nonfinite subordinate
clause to play the piano -- its main
verb play has the to-infinitive form.
On the other
hand, subordinate clauses can be either finite or nonfinite: Finite: He said [SubC that they stayed at
a lovely hotel] -- past tense Nonfinite:
I was advised [SubC to sell my old car] -- to-infinitive
11.3 Subordinate Clause Types
Subordinate
clauses may be finite or nonfinite. Within this broad classification, we can
make many further distinctions. We will begin by looking at subordinate clauses
which are distinguished by their formal characteristics.
Many subordinate clauses are named
after the form of the verb which they contain:
You must book
early [to secure a seat] BARE
INFINITIVE CLAUSE:
They made [the professor forget his notes]
-ING PARTICIPLE CLAUSE:
His hobby is [collecting
old photographs]
-ED PARTICIPLE CLAUSE:
[Rejected by his parents], the boy turned to a life of crime
For convenience, we sometimes
name a clause after its first element:
IF-CLAUSE:
I'll be there at nine [if I catch the early train]
As we'll see on the next page, if-clauses are sometimes called conditional clauses.
THAT-CLAUSE:
David thinks [that we should have a meeting] The that element is sometimes ellipted:
David thinks [we should have a
meeting]
11.3.1 Relative Clauses
An important type of subordinate clause is the RELATIVE CLAUSE. Here
are some examples: The man [who lives beside us] is ill
The video [which you recommended]
was terrific
Relative clauses
are generally introduced by a relative pronoun, such as who, or which. However,
the relative pronoun may be ellipted:
The video [you recommended] was
terrific
Another variant, the REDUCED RELATIVE CLAUSE, has no
relative pronoun, and the verb is nonfinite:
The man [living beside us] is
ill
(Compare: The
man [who lives beside us]...)
11.3.2 Nominal Relative Clauses
NOMINAL RELATIVE
CLAUSES (or independent relatives) function in some respects like noun phrases:
[What I like
best] is football (cf. the sport I like
best...)
The prize
will go to [whoever submits the best design] (cf. the person who submits...)
My son is
teaching me [how to use email] (cf. the
way to use email)
This is
[where Shakespeare was born] (cf. the
place where...)
The similarity
with NPs can be further seen in the fact that certain nominal relatives exhibit
number contrast:
Singular: [What
we need] is a plan Plural: [What we
need] are new ideas
Notice the agreement here with is (singular) and are (plural).
11.3.3
Small Clauses
Finally, we will
mention briefly an unusual type of clause, the verbless or SMALL CLAUSE. While
clauses usually contain a verb, which is finite or nonfinite, small clauses
lack an overt verb:
Susan found [the job very
difficult]
We analyse this
as a unit because clearly its parts cannot be separated. What Susan found was
not the job, but the job very difficult. And we analyse this unit specifically as a
clause because we can posit an implicit verb, namely, a form of the verb be:
Susan found [the job (to be) very difficult]
Here are some more examples of
small clauses:
Susan
considers [David an idiot]
The jury found
[the defendant guilty] [Lunch over], the guests departed quickly
All of the
clause types discussed here are distinguished by formal characteristics. On the
next page, we will distinguish some more types, this time on the basis of their
meaning.
11.4 Subordinate Clauses: Semantic Types
Here we will
look at subordinate clauses from the point of view of their meaning. The main
semantic types are exemplified in the following table:
Subordinate
Clause Type |
Example |
Temporal |
I'll ring you again [before I leave] David
joined the army [after he graduated]
[When you leave], please close the
door I read the newspaper [while I was waiting] |
Conditional |
I'll be there at nine [if I can catch the early train] [Provided he works hard], he'll do very well at school Don't call
me [unless its an emergency] |
Concessive |
He bought
me a lovely gift, [although he can't
really afford it] [Even though he worked hard], he failed
the final exam [While I don't agree with her], I can
understand her viewpoint |
Reason |
Paul was an hour late [because he missed the train] I borrowed
your lawn mower, [since you weren't
using it] |
|
|
Result |
The
kitchen was flooded, [so we had to go
to a restaurant] I've forgotten my password, [so I can't read my email] |
Comparative |
This is a
lot more difficult [than I expected]
She earns as much money [as I do] I think
London is less crowded [than it used to
be] |
The table does
not cover all the possible types, but it does illustrate many of the various
meanings which can be expressed by subordinate clauses.
Notice that the
same word can introduce different semantic types. For instance, the word while can introduce a temporal clause:
I read the
newspaper [while I was waiting] or a
concessive clause:
[While I don't agree with her], I can
understand her viewpoint. Similarly, the word since can express time:
I've known him [since he was a child] as well as reason:
I borrowed your lawn mower, [since you weren't using it]
In the following
exercise, be aware of words like these, which can introduce more than one type
of subordinate clause.
11.5 Sentences
Most people
recognise a sentence as a unit which begins with a capital letter and ends with
a full stop (period), a question mark, or an exclamation mark. Of course, this
applies only to written sentences. Sentences have also been defined notionally
as units which express a "complete thought", though it is not at all
clear what a "complete thought" is.
It is more useful to define a sentence syntactically, as
a unit which consists of one or more clauses. According to this definition, the
following examples are all sentences:
[1]
Paul likes
football
[2] You can
borrow my pen if you need one
[3]
Paul likes football and David likes chess
Sentence [1] is a SIMPLE
SENTENCE -- it contains only one clause.
Sentence [2]
consists of a matrix clause You can
borrow my pen if you need one, and a subordinate clause if you need one. This is called a
COMPLEX SENTENCE. A complex sentence is defined as a sentence which contains at
least one subordinate clause.
Finally,
sentence [3] consists of two clauses which are coordinated with each other.
This is a COMPOUND sentence.
By using
subordination and coordination, sentences can potentially be infinitely long,
but in all cases we can analyse them as one or more clauses.
11.6 The Discourse Functions of Sentences
Sentences may be
classified according to their use in discourse. We recognise four main sentence
types:
·
declarative
·
interrogative
·
imperative
·
exclamative
11.6.1
Declarative
Declarative sentences are used to convey information or to make
statements: David plays the piano
I hope you can
come tomorrow We've forgotten the milk
Declarative sentences are by far
the most common type.
11.6.2
Interrogative
Interrogative sentences are
used in asking questions:
Did you receive
my message? Have you found a new job yet?
The examples
above are specifically YES/NO INTERROGATIVES, because they elicit a response
which is either yes or no.
ALTERNATIVE INTERROGATIVES
offer two or more alternative responses:
Should I
telephone you or send an email? Do you want tea, coffee, or espresso?
Yes/no interrogatives and alternative interrogatives are introduced
by an auxiliary verb.
WH- INTERROGATIVES, on the
other hand, are introduced by a wh- word,
and they elicit an open- ended response:
What happened?
Where do you work?
Who won the Cup Final in 1997?
Questions are
sometimes tagged onto the end of a declarative sentence: David plays the piano,
doesn't he?
We've forgotten the milk, haven't we?
There's a big match tonight, isn't there?
These are known
as TAG QUESTIONS. They consist of a main or auxiliary verb followed by a
pronoun or existential there
11.6.3
Imperative
Imperative sentences are used in issuing orders or directives: Leave
your coat in the hall
Give me your
phone number Don't shut the door
Stop!
Tag questions
are sometimes added to the end of imperatives: Leave your coat in the hall, will you?
Write soon, won't
you?
In an imperative sentence, the main verb is in the base
form. This is an exception to the general rule that matrix clauses are always
finite.
11.6.4
Exclamative
Exclamative sentences are used to
make exclamations:
What a stupid
man he is! How wonderful you look!
The four
sentence types exhibit different syntactic forms, which we will be looking at
in a later section. For now, it is worth pointing out that there is not
necessarily a one-to-one relationship between the form of a sentence and its
discourse function. For instance, the following sentence has declarative form:
You need some help
But when this is
spoken with a rising intonation, it becomes a question: You need some help?
Conversely,
rhetorical questions have the form of an interrogative, but they are really
statements: Who cares? ( = I don't care)
11.7 The Grammatical Hierarchy: Words, Phrases, Clauses, and Sentences
Words, phrases,
clauses, and sentences constitute what is called the GRAMMATICAL HIERARCHY. We
can represent this schematically as follows:
sentences
consist of one or more...
clauses
consist of one or more...
phrases
consist of one or more...
words
Sentences are at the top of the hierarchy, so they are
the largest unit which we will be considering (though some grammars do look
beyond the sentence). At the other end of the hierarchy, words are at the
lowest level, though again, some grammars go below the word to consider
morphology, the study of how words are constructed.
At the clause level and at the
phrase level, two points should be noted:
1.
Although clauses are higher
than phrases in the hierarchy, clauses can occur within phrases, as we've
already seen:
The man who lives beside us is
ill
Here we have a relative clause who lives beside us within the NP the man who lives beside us.
2. We've
also seen that clauses can occur within clauses, and phrases can occur within phrases.
Bearing these
two points in mind, we can now illustrate the grammatical hierarchy using the
following sentence:
My brother won the lottery
As a means of
illustrating the grammatical hierarchy, the labelled brackets we have used here
have at least one major drawback. You've probably noticed it already -- they
are very difficult to interpret. And the problem becomes more acute as the
sentence becomes more complex. For this reason, linguists prefer to employ a
more visual method, the TREE DIAGRAM.
12 Form and Function
We have used the word "form" quite often in the Internet
Grammar. It was one of the criteria we used to distinguish between word classes
-- we saw that the form or "shape" of a word is often a good clue to
its word class.
When we
looked at phrases, too, we were concerned with their form. We said that phrases
may have the basic form (Pre-Head string)
- Head - (Post-Head string).
And finally, we classified
clauses according to the form (finite or nonfinite) of their main verb.
In all of these cases, we were
conducting a FORMAL analysis. Form denotes
how something looks -
- its shape
or appearance, and what its structure is. When we say that the old man is an NP, or that the
old man bought a newspaper is a finite clause, we are carrying out a formal
analysis.
We can also look
at constituents -- phrases and clauses -- from another angle. We can examine
the FUNCTIONs which they perform in the larger structures which contain them.
12.1 Subject and Predicat
The most
familiar grammatical function is the SUBJECT. In notional terms, we can think
of the Subject as the element which performs the "action" denoted by
the verb:
[1]
David plays the piano
[2] The police interviewed all the witnesses
In [1], the
Subject David performs the action of
playing the piano. In [2], the Subject the
police performs the action of interviewing all the witnesses. In these
terms, this means that we can identify the Subject by asking a wh-question:
[1]
David plays the piano
Q. Who plays the piano?
A. David (
= Subject)
[2] The
police interviewed all the witnesses
Q. Who interviewed all the
witnesses?
A. The police (=
Subject)
Having
identified the Subject, we can see that the remainder of the sentence tells us
what the Subject does or did. In [1], for example, plays the piano tells us what David does. We refer to this string
as the PREDICATE of the sentence. In [2], the Predicate is interviewed all the witnesses.
Here are some more examples of
sentences labelled for Subject and Predicate.
Subject |
Predicate |
The lion |
roared |
He |
writes well |
She |
enjoys going
to the cinema |
The girl in the blue dress |
arrived late |
In each of these examples, the Subject performs the
action described in the Predicate. We've seen, however, that there are problems
in defining verbs as "action" words, and for the same reasons, there
are problems in defining the Subject as the "performer" of the
action. The Subject in John seems unhappy
is John, but we would hardly say
he is performing an action. For this reason, we need to define the Subject more
precisely than this. We will look at the characteristics of the Subject on the
next page.
12.2 Characteristics of the Subject
The grammatical Subject has a
number of characteristics which we will examine here.
1.
Subject-Verb Inversion
In a declarative sentence, the
Subject comes before the verb:
Declarative: David is unwell
When we change
this into a yes/no interrogative, the
Subject and the verb change places with each other:
If an auxiliary verb is present,
however, the Subject changes places with the auxiliary:
Declarative: Jim has left already
Interrogative: Has Jim left already?
In this
interrogative, the Subject still comes before the main verb, but after the
auxiliary. This is true also of interrogatives with a do-auxiliary:
Declarative: Jim left early
Interrogative: Did Jim leave early?
Subject-verb
inversion is probably the most reliable method of identifying the Subject of a
sentence.
2.
Position of the Subject
In a declarative sentence, the
Subject is usually the first constituent:
Jim was in bed
Paul arrived too late for the party
The Mayor of New York attended the banquet
We made a donation to charity
However, there are exceptions
to this. For instance:
Yesterday the theatre was
closed
Here, the first
constituent is the adverb phrase yesterday,
but this is not the Subject of the sentence. Notice that the theatre, and not yesterday,
inverts with the verb in the interrogative:
Declarative: Yesterday the theatre was
closed
Interrogative: Yesterday was the theatre
closed?
So the Subject here is the theatre, even though it is not the
first constituent in the sentence.
3.
Subject-verb Agreement
Subject-verb
AGREEMENT or CONCORD relates to number agreement (singular or plural) between
the Subject and the verb which follows it:
Singular
Subject: The dog howls all night
Plural Subject:
The dogs howl all night
There are two
important limitations to Subject-verb agreement. Firstly, agreement only
applies when the verb is in the present tense. In the past tense, there is no
overt agreement between the Subject and the verb:
The dog howled all night The dogs howled all night
And secondly,
agreement applies only to third person Subjects. There is no distinction, for
example, between a first person singular Subject and a first person plural
Subject:
I howl all night
We howl all night
The concept of NOTIONAL
AGREEMENT sometimes comes into play:
The government is considering the proposal The
government are considering the
proposal
Here, the form
of the verb is not determined by the form of the Subject. Instead, it is
determined by how we interpret the Subject. In the government is..., the Subject is interpreted as a unit,
requiring a singular form of the verb. In the government are..., the Subject is
interpreted as having a plural meaning, since it relates to a collection of
individual people. Accordingly, the verb has the plural form are.
4.
Subjective Pronouns
The pronouns
I, he/she/it, we, they, always
function as Subjects, in contrast with me,
him/her, us, them:
I left early
*Me left
early
He left early
*Him left
early
We left early
*Us left
early
They left early
*Them left
early
The pronoun you can also be a Subject:
You left early
but it does not
always perform this function. In the following example, the Subject is Tom, not you: Tom likes you
12.3 Realisations of the Subject
In the
sentence, Jim was in bed, the Subject
is the NP Jim. More precisely, we say
that the Subject is realised by the
NP Jim. Conversely, the NP Jim is the realisation of the Subject in this sentence. Remember that NP is a formal term, while Subject is
a functional term:
FORM |
FUNCTION |
Noun Phrase |
Subject |
Subjects are
typically realised by NPs. This includes NPs which have pronouns [1], cardinal
numerals [2], and ordinal numerals [3] as their Head word:
[1] [We]
decided to have a party
[2] [One of
my contacts lenses] fell on the floor
[3] [The
first car to reach Brighton] is the winner
However, other
constituents can also function as Subjects, and we will examine these in the
following sections.
Clauses functioning as Subject
Clauses can also
function as Subjects. When they perform this function, we refer to them
generally as Subject clauses. The
table below shows examples of the major types of Subject clauses:
CLAUSES functioning
as SUBJECTS |
EXAMPLE |
Finite That-clause Nominal Relative clause |
[1] That his theory was flawed soon became obvious [2] What I need is a long holiday |
Nonfinite To-infinitive clause -ing clause |
[3] To become an opera singer takes years of training [4] Being the chairman is a huge responsibility |
Notice that
some of these Subject clauses have Subjects of their own. In [1], the Subject
clause that his theory was flawed,
has its own Subject, his theory.
Similarly, in [2], the Subject of what I
need is I.
Among nonfinite
clauses, only to-infinitive clauses
and -ing participle clauses can
function as Subject. Bare infinitive clauses and -ed participle clauses cannot perform this function. In the
examples above -- [3] and [4] -- the nonfinite Subject clauses do not have
Subjects of their own, although they can do:
[3a] For Mary to become an opera singer would
take years of training [4a] David being
the chairman has meant more work for all of us
Prepositional Phrases
functioning as Subject
Less commonly, the Subject may be
realised by a prepositional phrase:
After nine is a good time to ring
Prepositional phrases as Subject
typically refer to time or to space.
12.4 Some Unusual Subjects
Before leaving
this topic, we will point out some grammatical Subjects which may at first
glance be difficult to recognise as such. For example, can you work out the
Subject of the following sentence?
There is a fly in my soup
As we've seen,
the most reliable test for identifying the Subject is Subject-verb inversion,
so let's try it here:
Declarative: There is a fly in my soup
Interrogative: Is there a fly in my soup?
The inversion
test shows that the subject is there.
You will recall that this is an example of existential there, and the sentence in which it is the Subject is an existential sentence.
Now try the same test on the
following:
It is raining
The inversion test shows that
the Subject is it:
Declarative: It is raining
Interrogative: Is it raining?
These two
examples illustrate how limited the notional definition of the Subject really
is. In no sense can we say that there and
it are performing an
"action" in their respective sentences, and yet they are
grammatically functioning as Subjects.
On this page, we've seen that the function of Subject can be realised by
several different forms. Conversely, the various forms (NP, clause, PP, etc)
can perform several other functions, and we will look at these in the following
pages.
12.5 Inside the Predicate
Now we will look inside the Predicate, and assign
functions to its constituents. Recall that the Predicate is everything apart
from the Subject. So in David plays the
piano, the Predicate is plays the
piano. This Predicate consists of a verb phrase, and we can divide this
into two further elements:
[plays] [the piano]
In formal terms,
we refer to the verb as the PREDICATOR, because its function is to predicate or state something about the
subject. Notice that Predicator is a
functional term, while verb is a
formal term:
FORM |
FUNCTION |
Verb |
Predicator |
However, since
the Predicator is always realised by
a verb, we will continue to use the more familiar term verb, even when we are discussing functions.
12.6 The Direct Object
In the sentence David plays the piano, the NP the piano is the constituent which
undergoes the "action" of being played (by David, the Subject). We
refer to this constituent as the DIRECT OBJECT.
Here are some more examples of
Direct Objects:
We bought a
new computer
I used to ride a
motorbike
The police interviewed all the witnesses
We can usually
identify the Direct Object by asking who or
what was affected by the Subject. For
example:
We bought a new
computer
Q. What did we buy?
A. A new computer ( = the Direct Object)
The Direct
Object generally comes after the verb, just as the Subject generally comes
before it. So in a declarative sentence, the usual pattern is:
Subject -- Verb -- Direct Object
The following table shows more
examples of this pattern:
Subject |
Verb |
Direct Object |
The
tourists |
visited |
the old cathedral |
She |
sent |
a postcard |
The
detectives |
examined |
the scene of the crime |
12.7 Realisations of the Direct Object
The Direct
Object is most often realised by an NP, as in the examples above. However, this
function can also be realised by a clause. The following table shows examples
of clauses functioning as Direct Objects:
CLAUSES functioning as DIRECT OBJECTS |
EXAMPLES |
Finite That-clause Nominal relative clause |
[1]
He thought that he had a perfect alibi [2]
The officer described what he saw through the keyhole |
Nonfinite To-infinitive clause Bare
infinitive clause -ing clause -ed clause |
[3]
The dog wants to play in the garden [4]
She made the lecturer laugh [5]
Paul loves playing
football [6]
I'm having my house
painted |
12.8
Subjects
and Objects, Active and Passive
A useful way to
compare Subjects and Direct Objects is to observe how they behave in active and
passive sentences. Consider the following active sentence:
Active: Fire destroyed
the palace
Here we have a Subject fire and
a Direct Object the palace. Now let's
convert this into a passive sentence:
The change from active to passive
has the following results:
1. The
active Direct Object the palace becomes
the passive Subject
2. The
active Subject fire becomes part of
the PP by fire (the by-agent phrase).
12.9 The Indirect Object
Some verbs occur with two
Objects:
We gave [John] [a present]
Here, the NP a present undergoes the
"action" (a present is what is given). So a present is the Direct Object. We refer to the NP John as the INDIRECT OBJECT.
Indirect Objects
usually occur with a Direct Object, and they always come before the Direct Object. The typical pattern is:
Subject -- Verb --
Indirect Object -- Direct Object
Here are some more examples of
sentences containing two objects:
|
Indirect
Object |
Direct Object |
Tell |
me |
a story |
He
showed |
us |
his war
medals |
We
bought |
David |
a birthday
cake |
your
colleague |
a pen? |
Verbs which take
an Indirect Object and a Direct Object are known as DITRANSITIVE verbs. Verbs
which take only a Direct Object are called MONOTRANSITIVE verbs. The verb tell is a typical ditransitive verb, but
it can also be monotransitive:
|
|
Indirect Object |
Direct Object |
Ditransitive |
David told |
the children |
a story |
Monotransitive |
David told |
|
a story |
As we've seen,
an Indirect Object usually co-occurs with a Direct Object. However, with some
verbs an Indirect Object may occur alone:
David told the
children
although we can
usually posit an implicit Direct Object in such cases: David told the children the news
12.10 Realisations of the Indirect Object
NPs are the most
common realisations of the Indirect Object. It is a typical function of
pronouns in the objective case, such as me,
him, us, and them.
Less commonly, a clause will
function as Indirect Object:
David told whoever
saw her to report to the police
12.11 Adjuncts
Certain parts of
a sentence may convey information about how,
when, or where something happened:
He ate his
meal quickly (how) David gave blood last week (when)
Susan went to school in New York (where)
The highlighted constituents here are ADJUNCTS. From a
syntactic point of view, Adjuncts are optional elements, since their omission
still leaves a complete sentence:
He ate his
meal quickly ~He ate his meal David
gave blood last week ~David gave blood
Susan went to
school in New York ~Susan went to
school
Many types of constituents can
function as Adjuncts, and we exemplify these below.
12.12 Realisations of Adjuncts
Noun Phrases functioning as Adjuncts
David gave blood last
week
Next summer, we're going to Spain
We've agreed to meet the day after tomorrow
NPs as Adjuncts generally refer
to time, as in these examples.
Adverb Phrases functioning as Adjuncts
They ate their meal too quickly
She walked very
gracefully down the steps
Suddenly, the door opened
Prepositional Phrases functioning as Adjuncts
Susan went to school in New York
I work late on
Mondays
After work, I go to a local restaurant
PPs as Adjuncts
generally refer to time or to place -- they tell us when or where something happens.
Clauses functioning as Adjuncts
Subordinate
clauses can function as Adjuncts. We'll begin with some examples of finite
subordinate clauses:
EXAMPLES |
|
Finite |
While we were crossing the park, we heard
a loud explosion I was late for the interview because the train broke down If you want tickets for the concert, you have to apply early My car broke down, so I had to walk |
Nonfinite To-infinitive clause Bare
infinitive clause -ing clause -ed clause Small clause |
To open the
window,
you have to climb a ladder Rather than leave the child alone, I
brought him to work with me Being a
qualified plumber, Paul had no difficulty in finding the leak Left to himself, he usually gets the
job done quickly His face red
with rage,
John stormed out of the room |
You will notice
that these clauses express the range of meanings that we looked at earlier (in
Subordinate Clauses: Semantic Types). In all cases, notice also that the
Adjuncts express additional and optional information. If they are omitted, the
remaining clause is still syntactically complete.
12.13 Sentence Patterns from a Functional Perspective
In order to
summarise what we have learned, we will now look at some typical sentence
patterns from a functional perspective. We will then conclude this section by looking
at some untypical patterns, on the next page.
As we've seen,
the Subject is usually (but not always) the first element in a sentence, and it
is followed by the verb:
Pattern 1
Subject |
Verb |
David The dog Susan |
sings barked yawned |
In this pattern,
the verb is not followed by any Object, and we refer to this as an intransitive
verb. If the verb is monotransitive, it takes a Direct Object, which follows
the verb:
Pattern 2
Subject |
Verb |
Direct Object |
David The professor The jury |
sings wants found |
ballads to retire the defendant
guilty |
In the
ditransitive pattern, the verb is followed by an Indirect Object and a Direct
Object, in that order:
Pattern 3
Subject |
Verb |
Indirect
Object |
Direct Object |
The old man My uncle The
detectives |
gave sent asked |
the children me Amy |
some money a present lots of
questions |
Adjuncts are
syntactically peripheral to the rest of the sentence. They may occur at the
beginning and at the end of a sentence, and they may occur in all three of the
patterns above:
Pattern 4
(Adjunct) |
Subject |
Verb |
Indirect |
Direct Object |
(Adjunct) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Usually |
David |
sings |
|
|
in the bath |
[2] |
Unfortunately |
the professor |
wants |
|
to retire |
this year |
[3] |
At the start of the trial |
the judge |
showed |
the jury |
the photographs |
in a private chamber |
Pattern 4 is essentially a conflation of the other three, with Adjuncts
added. We have bracketed the Adjuncts to show that they are optional. Strictly
speaking, Objects are also optional, since they are only required by
monotransitive and ditransitive verbs, as in the examples [2] and [3] above.
12.14 Some Untypical Sentence Patterns
The sentence patterns we looked at on the
previous page represent typical or canonical patterns But you will often come
across sentences which do not conform to these patterns. We will look at some
of these here.
Extraposition
The Subject is
sometimes postponed until the end of the sentence. Here are some examples: In
first place is Red Rum
Inside the house were two detectives
More important is the question of compensation
Here, the
typical declarative order has been disrupted for stylistic effect. In these
examples, the Subject comes after the
verb, and is said to be EXTRAPOSED. Compare them with the more usual pattern:
In first place is Red Rum ~Red
Rum is in first place
Inside
the house were two detectives
~Two detectives were
inside the house
More important is the question of compensation
~The question of
compensation is more important
The Subject is also extraposed
when the sentence is introduced by anticipatory it:
It is a good idea to book early
It is not surprising that he failed his exams
In the more typical pattern,
these constructions may sound stylistically awkward:
To book early is a good idea
That he failed
his exams is
not surprising
Extraposition is not always just
a matter of style. In the following examples, it is obligatory:
It
seems that he'll be late again
~*That
he'll be late again
seems
It turned out that his secretary
had stolen the money
~*That his secretary had
stolen the money turned out
Direct Objects,
too, can be extraposed. Recall that their typical position is after the verb
(Pattern 2). However, when anticipatory it
is used, the Direct Object is extraposed:
He made it very clear that he would not be coming back
Again, the canonical pattern is
stylistically very awkward:
*He made that
he would not be coming back very clear
Cleft
Sentences
A
declarative sentence, such as David
studied English at Oxford can be reformulated as: It was David who studied
English at Oxford
This is called a
CLEFT SENTENCE because the original sentence has been divided (or
"cleft") into two clauses: It
was David and who studied English at
Oxford. Cleft sentences focus on one constituent of the original sentence,
placing it after it was (or it is). Here we have focussed on the
Subject David, but we could also
focus on the Direct Object English:
It was English that David studied at Oxford or
on the Adjunct at Oxford
It was at
Oxford that David studied English
Cleft
constructions, then, exhibit the pattern:
It + be + focus + clause
13 Functions and Phrases
The
syntactic functions which we looked at in the last section -- Subject, Object,
Predicate, Adjunct, etc -- are all functions within sentences or clauses. We
saw, for instance, that most sentences can be divided into two main functional
constituents, the Subject and the Predicate:
Subject |
Predicate |
[1] The lion |
Roared |
[2] He |
writes well |
[3] She |
enjoys going to the cinema |
[4] The girl in the blue dress |
arrived late |
Within the
Predicate, too, constituents perform various functions -- in [3], for example, going to the cinema performs the
function of Direct Object, while in [4], late
performs the function of Adjunct. In each of these cases, we are referring
to the roles which these constituents perform in the sentence or clause.
We can also
assign functions to the constituents of a phrase. Recall that we have said that
all phrases have the following generalised structure:
(pre-Head
string) --- Head --- (post-Head string) where the parentheses denote optional
elements.
In this
section, we will consider the functions of these parts of a phrase -- what
roles do they perform in the phrase as a whole?
We will begin by looking at functions within verb
phrases.
13.1 Complements
Consider the
bracketed verb phrase in the following sentence: David [VP plays the piano]
In formal terms, we can analyse
this VP using the familiar three-part structure:
pre-Head string |
Head |
post-Head
string |
-- |
plays |
the piano |
Let us now consider the functions
of each of these three parts.
Actually, we
already know the function of one of the parts -- the word plays functions as the Head of this VP. The term "Head"
is a functional label, indicated by the capital (upper case) letter.
Remember that we also capitalize
the other functions -- Subject, Object, Predicate, etc.
Turning now to
the post-Head string the piano, we
can see that it completes the meaning of the Head plays. In functional terms, we refer to this string as the
COMPLEMENT of the Head. Here are some more examples of Complements in verb
phrases:
pre-Head string |
Head |
Complement |
never |
needs |
money |
-- |
eat |
vegetables |
not |
say |
what he is
doing |
In each case,
the Complement completes the meaning of the Head, so there is a strong
syntactic link between these two strings.
At this point
you may be wondering why we do not simply say that these post-Head strings are
Direct Objects. Why do we need the further term Complement?
The string which
completes the meaning of the Head is not always a Direct Object. Consider the
following:
Here the
post-Head string (the Complement) is an Indirect Object. With ditransitive
verbs, two Objects appear:
We [VP gave James a present]
Here, the
meaning of the Head gave is completed
by two strings -- James and a present. Each string is a Complement
of the Head gave.
Finally, consider verb phrases
in which the Head is a form of the verb be:
David [VP is a
musician] Amy [VP is clever]
Our car [VP is in the carpark]
The post-Head
strings here are neither Direct Objects nor Indirect Objects. The verb be is known as a COPULAR verb. It takes
a special type of Complement which we will refer to generally as a
COPULAR
COMPLEMENT. There is a small number of other copular verbs. In the following
examples, we have highlighted the Head, and italicised the Complement:
Our teacher
[VP became angry] Your sister [VP seems
upset]
All the
players [VP felt very tired] after the game That [VP sounds great]
It is clear from
this that we require the general term Complement
to encompass all post-Head strings, regardless of their type. In verb
phrases, a wide range of Complements can appear, but in all cases there is a
strong syntactic link between the Complement and the Head. The Complement is
that part of the VP which is required to complete the meaning of the Head.
13.2 Complements in other Phrase Types
Complements also
occur in all of the other phrase types. We exemplify each type in the following
table:
Phrase Type |
Head |
Typical Complements |
Examples |
Noun
Phrase (NP) |
noun |
PP |
respect for
human rights |
|
|
|
the realisation that
nothing has changed |
Verb
Phrase (VP) |
verb |
NP clause PP |
David plays the piano They
realised that nothing has changed She looked at
the moon |
Adjective
Phrase (AP) |
adjective |
clause PP |
easy to
read fond of
biscuits |
Adverb
Phrase (AdvP) |
adverb |
PP |
luckily for
me |
Prepositional
Phrase (PP) |
preposition |
NP PP |
in the
room from behind
the wall |
Adverb phrases
are very limited in the Complements they can take. In fact, they generally
occur without any Complement.
Noun phrases
which take Complements generally have an abstract noun as their Head, and they
often have a verbal counterpart:
the pursuit of happiness ~we pursue happiness
their belief in ghosts ~they
believe in ghosts
the
realisation that nothing has changed ~they
realise that nothing has changed
13.3 Adjuncts in Phrases
The term
"Complement" is not simply another word for the "post-Head
string" -- post-Head strings are not always Complements. This is because
the post-Head string is not always required to complete the meaning of the
Head. Consider:
[NP My sister, who will be twenty next week,] has
got a new job.
Here the relative
clause who will be twenty next week is
certainly a post-Head string, but it is not a Complement. Notice that it
contributes additional but optional information about the Head sister. In this example, the post-Head
string is an ADJUNCT. Like the other Adjuncts we looked at earlier, it
contributes additional, optional information.
Adjuncts can
occur in all the phrase types, and they may occur both before and after the
Head. The following table shows examples of each type:
Phrase Type |
Head |
Typical
Adjuncts |
Examples |
Noun
Phrase (NP) |
noun |
PP AP clause |
the books on the shelf the old lady cocoa, which is made from cacao beans |
Verb
Phrase (VP) |
verb |
AdvP PP |
she rapidly
lost interest he stood on
the patio |
Adjective
Phrase (AP) |
adjective |
AdvP |
it was terribly
difficult |
Prepositional
Phrase (PP) |
preposition |
AdvP |
completely out of control |
13.4 Complements and Adjuncts Compared
Complements differ from
Adjuncts in two important respects:
1.
Complements immediately
follow the Head
In most phrases,
the Complement must immediately follow the Head: David [VP plays [Complement the
piano] [Adjunct beautifully ]]
In contrast, the reverse order is
not possible:
*David [VP plays [Adjunct beautifully]
[Complement the piano]]
fond [Complement
of biscuits] [Adjunct with coffee]
~*fond [Adjunct with coffee] [Complement of
biscuits]
Complements, then, bear a much
closer relationship to the Head than Adjuncts do.
2.
Adjuncts are "stackable"
In theory at
least, we can "stack" an indefinite number of Adjuncts, one after
another, within a phrase. For example, consider the NP:
|
Adjunct |
Adjunct |
Adjunct |
Adjunct |
the
book |
on the shelf |
by Dickens |
with the red
cover |
that you gave
me... |
In contrast with
this, phrases are limited in the number of Complements that they can take. In
fact, they usually have only one Complement. Ditransitive verb phrases are an
exception to this. Recall that they take two Complements:
We [VP gave [Complement
James] [Complement a present]]
13.5 Specifiers
Adjuncts can
appear before the Head of a phrase, as well as after the Head. For example, in
the following NP, the Adjunct sudden is
part of what we have been calling the pre-Head string:
? |
Adjunct |
Head |
Complement |
the |
sudden |
realisation |
that nothing has changed |
In this section
we will look at the function of the remaining part of the pre-Head string. In
this example, what is the function of the
in the phrase as a whole?
We refer to this
part of the phrase as the SPECIFIER of the phrase. Again, Specifiers may occur
in all the major phrase types, and we exemplify them in the following table:
Phrase Type |
Head |
Typical
Specifiers |
Examples |
Noun
Phrase (NP) |
noun |
Determiners |
the vehicle an objection some people |
Verb
Phrase (VP) |
verb |
`negative' elements |
not arrive never plays the piano |
Adjective
Phrase (AP) |
adjective |
AdvP |
quite remarkable very fond of animals |
Prepositional
Phrase (PP) |
preposition |
AdvP |
just across the street |
An important point about Specifiers is that they
relate to the Head + Complement sequence, and not to the Head alone. For
example, in the AP very fond of animals ,
the Specifier very relates to fond of animals, not just to fond:
Amy is very
fond of animals
Q. Amy is very what?
A. *Fond
A. Fond of animals
In
functional terms, then, the three-part structure of a phrase can be summarised
as:
Comments
Post a Comment